Re: [Tools-discuss] Serving a partial documents (was Re: [rfc-i] Citing drafts)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 26 February 2021 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF8A3A1647 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:58:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IsogymkihLMr for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:58:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A2E3A1644 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:58:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.123] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DnL7H6jJgzyWt; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:58:19 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <408715F8-0E0E-4047-B579-EC0A052F98FD@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:58:19 +0100
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 636062299.417989-920eb5682543df19c3e5630694482d20
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CCE26FB3-B7B8-41FE-80C9-FB8F1FE9E5EF@tzi.org>
References: <ca04c9b0-a466-2bdb-7a4b-192ec12fc3fd@gmx.de> <780EF9C1-11FA-4ED2-B206-1FD82A1204CE@tzi.org> <3fee246b-7a01-7a4f-cb7a-a548f4040bd1@nostrum.com> <60392FB9.9060801@btconnect.com> <CD75A86D-FE9E-4F63-BAF9-7EEE0C2D6F84@akamai.com> <1d0d18c2-f63d-c867-99ed-68c4ab6aa425@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBOdMiB1Z72+EabcFp_bmzrVW_aREta=OX3S6rqKEGqJvQ@mail.gmail.com> <408715F8-0E0E-4047-B579-EC0A052F98FD@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/rMHR0zrt-kWeKNJ0KK2mwR3-t2E>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Serving a partial documents (was Re: [rfc-i] Citing drafts)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:58:25 -0000

On 2021-02-26, at 20:40, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I agree it makes sense to serve the full document now, but I also think having a link for just the ‘document status’ would be useful.  I don’t care how fast your link is, you don’t want to keep refreshing some honkin’ long draft just to see if the SECDIR person finished their review, especially if it’s your draft.

+1.

There should be separate landing and status pages (and archive access pages, for getting a verbatim copy of the submission).

Grüße, Carsten