Re: [Tools-discuss] Unicode decode error for RFCs

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sun, 04 April 2021 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F473A1A72 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 14:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JHM4tE4Li5V for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CEB3A1A71 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8180A7809EC; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:06:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-18-61.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.18.61]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2FCB4780C82; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:06:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.18.61 (trex/6.1.1); Sun, 04 Apr 2021 21:06:36 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Arithmetic-Quick: 5d6c08716065d83d_1617570396296_2723718699
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1617570396296:1703412211
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1617570396295
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2C187AC6; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:06:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=ufjkPPTUcNODvN TIWCxuvUL2XMc=; b=YW54yP1Zji9uSRO9ovXabvDh2SDPkuomYN/w/uIgV0XzrQ 2iOc5Xqb1XudObs480YmrqtuHPHt+GSvHbsh8GvLWCzzbER71vkMBLLtW4WuiX01 Z3ms/0YhYYouCleVVAVEjMhje3jjoGGfjzKMItS5cpaKijsIHl5/Xf0hYeTuo=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20B8E85DB1; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:06:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 16:06:29 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a70
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210404210629.GE3828@localhost>
References: <3C729A10-5F70-465F-AD97-0A1338836C82@vpnc.org> <4790f6a6-5893-e8e6-7361-74657a6735d7@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4790f6a6-5893-e8e6-7361-74657a6735d7@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/rMqpp509S9B25t6PmVtwpAO4A3U>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Unicode decode error for RFCs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 21:06:42 -0000

On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 03:41:21PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I mean, who cares about the htmlized versions of HTML RFCs?

I do.  I like them better.