Re: [Tools-discuss] HTML vs HTMLized

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 05 December 2019 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6785B12012A for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:26:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uu870TOCDIBt for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E07120125 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0623F3818F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:23:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7272366 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:26:48 -0500 (EST)
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <14533.1575553674@localhost> <91FC73D1-91C5-4155-A249-125F066B5027@levkowetz.com>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <fdbac244-694e-cb0a-8019-c4fd0a5b33e1@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:26:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91FC73D1-91C5-4155-A249-125F066B5027@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/rv5YtHqQUlWQxsRat8lyupnTM-M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] HTML vs HTMLized
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:26:52 -0000

On 2019-12-05 11:10 a.m., Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
>> On 5 Dec 2019, at 14:47, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for changing the default button to say "HTMLized" leaving room for
>> the "HTML" button.
>>
>> A question: do I only get HTML version from XML if I upload v3 XML?
> 
> Yes, that's right. There are too many issues with the v2 HTML output.

I upgraded the kramdown on my laptop, and generated a new .xml file.
I can't tell if it's v2 or v3 from a quick look at the file.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-ipv6-lldp/

is missing HTML version.  I wonder if the DT should keep track of which 
format was considered authoriative when uploaded (.txt, xml.v2, xml.v3).