IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 19 November 2020 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAFB3A0FD2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkDW-0rO1wGl for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8AA33A0658 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id w24so7690183wmi.0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=8DUjjMOpmqpYoZtjJzmcuYMl6Rf9Z3ZOAaLUpLSKIaQ=; b=cjVp2kGWQ40e50w0o2/1DwWw2XmLTK9+ZRiVQ8oQr4mTFUQBEkR4wHh+2d+Fr946B6 IrKjvXR2VYD1dEsD8/4FW7mCd1L+p2fdgnYd9gqFwslPqkn2viKB2vC9/lrNkYEsc6La b964URqmMwXtqUnZEZEO6FkF6OjvKVG/OvJcShqumtYvrwYTZRM4d5NI7y1bq9f4l3mt kCio2OvL4RdTWYf36mQDWyS/Krz1Un2+9tZAw3CjsFozOdgfQG61yC/nJ16V4rybHz2e 0w+kjGUsWJLjDFc/+uOff5vQNaPzuCFQQC+zgUZ45DtrKj1udhlTn8xeXqpemVxAdvVG Azgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=8DUjjMOpmqpYoZtjJzmcuYMl6Rf9Z3ZOAaLUpLSKIaQ=; b=jvmcF7Nd9eVkPuVM6L+Ng6Y+bC2sG7tVzR+XiDVBGVV0awW68R3Ygm46O2GFkXPy9D CbJR5lr787rzVSlJiiXgmcmmzdYZlyW08aFNuO8y/jD9CAhSYoGvhjDmUQ7GTb5lXdC2 tuLggV5KgCHBisa4UW8FAt777Ujq0+0vL7tWMs0xLp9n8qnaSOrqHpuDS6XhzD5nNHEy IHybYKw0Igo4kLsdUNwK/oFN+HyA6uBB0mcvAklDOYBDD2cnYiyiqkVoF7J7j3ydrjIL GJ7B3ZdW4uy1PiGhxFyn9WIUILO9c24xCJVbzh2dWhAQbt7Gf8HtHlkwqACZHgjaxOOU K4xQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rsdD41iiJjs9aPw/Fxqumc4s4l5XLiPNqZvFf4viC3Yy1n4mw dSak/hAmhoJT0qvp048eZvY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhqzNm1fovip5qWr8A0BD+zMApP2GiwTl4mDu73vy9rQn/yWXsfl+8DcR7zQJ+sZhdP35jeg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a5d8:: with SMTP id o207mr6005699wme.0.1605811720034; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:c48f:7b8d:7703:cdf4? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:c48f:7b8d:7703:cdf4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z189sm1180680wme.23.2020.11.19.10.48.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E9F14A7E-8643-40F9-888A-96C1518D6E4E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_90553791-DDF7-4433-93EA-1032D8B0C3AC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:48:36 -0800
In-Reply-To: <B2E04650-8B9C-44F9-A425-F02B258D6E46@tzi.org>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <A23BCAC1-51E6-49DC-AC0B-52D4C08D5027@tzi.org> <16561.1605784069@localhost> <B2E04650-8B9C-44F9-A425-F02B258D6E46@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/rxNUgElzp1FSRKoaTL5E-fIg0Yc>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:48:43 -0000

> 
>> When/how/if to delete them is above my
>> pay grade.
> 
> “Deleting” would be wrong (we need the archive).
> Even “closing” would be questionable — recently, the ROHC list turned out to be useful after two years of silence.  There was a bit of a hiccup when IAB decided to close some lists…

Perhaps move them to an inactive page, I agree important to keep the archive.   Might also be good to put them in moderated mode to make it hard to spam people.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email