IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] HTML vs HTMLized

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 05 December 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5DD1207FC for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:38:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bT2S_Rzj9-Sb for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF851207FB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343523897A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:34:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB2A366 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:38:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <fdbac244-694e-cb0a-8019-c4fd0a5b33e1@sandelman.ca>
References: <14533.1575553674@localhost> <91FC73D1-91C5-4155-A249-125F066B5027@levkowetz.com> <fdbac244-694e-cb0a-8019-c4fd0a5b33e1@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:38:21 -0500
Message-ID: <21497.1575563901@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/sCd0bXjazCOZ5ZElptMDekbLTaw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] HTML vs HTMLized
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:38:25 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    >>> the "HTML" button.
    >>>
    >>> A question: do I only get HTML version from XML if I upload v3 XML?
    >>
    >> Yes, that's right. There are too many issues with the v2 HTML output.

    > I upgraded the kramdown on my laptop, and generated a new .xml file.
    > I can't tell if it's v2 or v3 from a quick look at the file.
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-ipv6-lldp/

I've concluded that I'm doing something wrong with kramdown, and I'm getting
v2 XML output, even when I ask for v3.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email