Re: [Tools-discuss] placing < and > in artwork renders broken html

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

On 2021-05-06, at 16:48, Paul Wouters <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 6 May 2021, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> 
>>> <artwork>    struct {
>>>       uint16 ExtSupportLifetime;
>>>       opaque AuthenticationChain&lt;1..2^16-1&gt;;
>>>   } DnssecChainExtension;
>>> </artwork>
>> 
>> That is what <[CDATA[ sections are good for:
>> 
>> <artwork><![CDATA[
>> struct {
>>     uint16 ExtSupportLifetime;
>>     opaque AuthenticationChain<1..2^16-1>
>> } DnssecChainExtension;
>> ]]></artwork>
> 
> Ahhh, I have used (copied it from others) before. I didn't realise I
> needed it here! But the markdown didn't generate that ofr me.

To clarify, you are talking about the tool called mmark.

>> Care linking to the specific file?
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukhovni-tls-dnssec-chain-05
> 
> That is me tweaking the xml and txt artisanally though. The original .md
> file (and the Makefile with my sanitizing hacks) is at:
> 
> https://github.com/vdukhovni/dnssec-chain-extension
> 
>> I don’t know which rfc markdown stuff you are referring to (there is a choice!), but see above for what is generated by rfc-kramdown.
> 
> Yes rfc-kramdown :)

I was trying to say kramdown-rfc, but misstated.
(Kramdown-rfc and mmark are the two markdown-to-rfc tools available right now.)

>> We wouldn’t have got to RFC 9000 if what you are experiencing were a common problem, so we do need to know some details.
> 
> I'm sure it's me, and you've already helped me a step in the right
> direction. 

Great!

Grüße, Carsten