Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 29 July 2020 14:48 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3410F3A0B8C; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIttqnEA_1-t; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A7F3A0B8B; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48DD548068; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:48:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id CC006440043; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:48:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:48:16 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200729144816.GB1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CA+wi2hMsSVn44PEoPeKHyyvnZ2eaE8bmyM0vGQMNYB3rc8DoWQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F7672D9-91FE-4D0E-ADA0-69EB0C2438A9@ietf.org> <CABFReBq04ERNkhp412QAJM-tqLA0cUnjbj6FXqeXQTGaWC-yAA@mail.gmail.com> <AEA414AB-D633-4258-8BDE-7FB2F7B72651@ietf.org> <CA+wi2hOa4W+R+_DD3T7Cn90g5CL4YZ7HyTv8omVudvAzP2fZYA@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBrjbZPeqDrKZAfNw45t5qawRrCL53Xx60psongXgHQ_2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hPn200ZeToVU2CAYK=4LZkjTBRJpm9Zu1_q0xqVnOhJ7g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hPn200ZeToVU2CAYK=4LZkjTBRJpm9Zu1_q0xqVnOhJ7g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/svV2BtDjyNr2ZSRnWttgVg86qeI>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:48:26 -0000
Adding tools-discuss as the authoritative group for MeetEcho feature requests, bcc wgchairs I want to be offensive-ranter (ok, better on smaller groups like BIER): I find these strict timelines that MeetEcho introduces extremely terrible. We had in BIER a poor presenter cut off just because we had a great presentation and discussion in a slot in before and therefore ran out of time. How is it possible that in a physcial meeting we are able to utilize all possible before andd after meeting times, and now going virtual where we should have FEWER time constraints, we enforce MORE ? No, i don't think 10 minutes before/after is sufficient. I think it should be AT MINIMUM IMHO 30 minutes on both sides, before and after. Pls. do not understand this big criticism as a big criticism of the tool. It is not. It is just a criticism of this feature. The tool itself is on a great trajectory! Cheers Toerless On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:46:46PM +0200, Tony Przygienda wrote: > That's my 2nd middle name ... > > lack-of-discipline is yours ;-) > > -- tony > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:34 PM Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Coward. :) > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I think the 5 mins before hour cut-off keeps things tight and is a good > >> thing ... > >> > >> -- tony > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:08 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 30/07/2020, at 1:01 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Having them stay open 10min after, or even to the actual WG ending hour > >>> would be great too. Not everyone is running off to the next meeting. > >>> > >>> > >>> They can only be kept open for 5 minutes after the scheduled close of > >>> the meeting as the same server/room is then used for another session and > >>> the 5 minute gap is used to close down the audio stream and other tidying > >>> up. > >>> > >>> Jay > >>> > >>> > >>> Greg > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:54 AM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 29/07/2020, at 10:47 PM, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Topic says it all. Rather than scrambling to figure out whether > >>>> audio/preso/internet works right @ beginning of session 10 minutes dry-run > >>>> grace period would be very helpful > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> They are now open 10 mins ahead of the session starting. It wasn???t > >>>> like that on day 1 but was changed for day 2 onwards. > >>>> > >>>> Jay > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- tony > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jay Daley > >>>> IETF Executive Director > >>>> jay@ietf.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Jay Daley > >>> IETF Executive Director > >>> jay@ietf.org > >>> > >>> -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Greg Shepherd
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Meetecho IETF support
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Greg Shepherd
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… info@meetecho.com
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Greg Shepherd
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened t… Jay Daley