IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] Asynchronous submission

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 27 May 2023 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12145C151549 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 May 2023 01:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KD49A38HdWLn for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 May 2023 01:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91308C14F74E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 May 2023 01:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dc0f6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.192.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QSwLT4pZXzDCbP; Sat, 27 May 2023 10:43:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 10:43:34 +0200
Message-Id: <E5FE4F29-B372-4191-8BC9-DDF8545DEC0D@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/tT9-Xlon0hYLQeyQNEh9YJiQqng>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Asynchronous submission
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 08:43:53 -0000

I just submitted a draft using the new asynchronous submission interface.

The user experience is jarring.  
The refresh interval is way too long(*) for something that usually took about a second in the previous version.
Of course, I now know that I can simply CMD-R (F5), but that behavior becoming ingrained may be counterproductive.

So maybe some adaptive refresh interval (with binary exponential backoff?) would be a useful enhancement.

Grüße, Carsten

(*) I have no idea how long, as my patience ran out.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email