[Tools-discuss] Re: Issue with the xml2rfc.bibxml rsync endpoint

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 14 August 2024 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90DEC18DBBC for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvysOqJ2Yzuw for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332C6C180B68 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clients-pool1-0074.vpn.uni-bremen.de (clients-pool1-0074.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WkYpc462szDCht; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:38:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9588D90E-3C0D-4007-A7DF-5FABF9FD8356@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:38:16 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 745346296.168594-8c239de028ee6156011f2f765f41d4f2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EBC46B4F-D59C-4B0D-8AFC-38E02FA35112@tzi.org>
References: <41225ec7-bf3d-4293-8711-01d011002258@nostrum.com> <9588D90E-3C0D-4007-A7DF-5FABF9FD8356@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Message-ID-Hash: 6LTLRL324Z4TADH2FNTWEORT5X6P5WBZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6LTLRL324Z4TADH2FNTWEORT5X6P5WBZ
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Issue with the xml2rfc.bibxml rsync endpoint
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/tfvMVf8Gov3ebhEW8G6CFZAp0C8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

On 2024-08-14, at 18:24, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>> Until we can get this deficiency with the bib service repaired, should 
>> we turn off the xml2rfc.bibxml endpoint or just note in its description 
>> that it is out of date?
> 
> That seems fine.  

This was a question posing an alternative…

I’d probably turn off the rsync module.

> Would it be possible to have a "00README.txt" or something that also contains information that there's been no updates in a couple of years, and we're working on fixing that?

An otherwise empty directory with just that file would also work.

Grüße, Carsten