Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66AD3A0C5E; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4K9OpdPryb75; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE843A0C62; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id x9so25478107ljc.5; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3XQ4CgJkMZ7gftaq5DczcdrDT3Pz8Xs1B1V9cVwtGH8=; b=ZFufC1z35/4Pvtu30may/R/bZTL6uvJQCNND83TkuuMXSCrx2uQ+97QQ5+00+95UoL 8MRwSghCykm7/J+YtBUbhFBEELmfMCGPn7r6jtc1UZ9ZfbhUI1/mHOFhYYmhAv4QdpTR nolv5TJZDL2rgHRiX10bXeXkppL30HNwbBd0mKf+M2mJM0H2bkymS3gI7WMQYp5GE7jv 4b0pQeCF2An5wzuJ1d/GssOUUJKPJ3DE+Dh4F7qG0YNWZ/YYSl/opq6lDkk1iOev7X2E AADlEtADcKK7D9AkLCSAkVC/IXIO0vPWcUJA6t32yTtYAWHNmcTqEZ6SFlaFLz3zF9U7 UgYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3XQ4CgJkMZ7gftaq5DczcdrDT3Pz8Xs1B1V9cVwtGH8=; b=Jbz0vUk1Uqzp2L4E+4N1GWCMZS7M4oHJGGt3Fykk4jozWw5nOmCyXQy+XUmQCmkCav vrr2u9irvpdhDEB/A/TkKrnAe36/6vxglUhYLuXwLL9/erhG+SltjQS1i10vULSUV2YC byd62JeA4XKz7S1pRN8b8X73O4x8uITV3+NVmtBzWr7iv8gtT1lQVfAOICAtahpzTRdM VYgY+t4fMSbFCw4yUXUFLNhoJiVmXOLoQHhMW3H+8iwwXbi0GKPPpH11UbZ/Up2fpXUH jEPJjzcHBK1kqthUOpjCf4R4scAwbzHH2sTGK9NuS21HrMaj1lVg/qnlnlTMOIz46Cps +hkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hdV3KnYTqP1pvzysVwKJIvy85GCPDoBd6ejB5I74x9AcKoAa0 46zvtzMd/Gwl58gwcl+q0fqoiyT1cXtV5l6bV94P4w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzRJfdPaNNsz3hs7TrCP7iOMUJQSG082C/96YTTTVqYhgad19X1E4IcZnpCBli1qEa9Zbru/fqh410YG/Cub0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:87c4:: with SMTP id v4mr6222636ljj.8.1596035943282; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+wi2hMsSVn44PEoPeKHyyvnZ2eaE8bmyM0vGQMNYB3rc8DoWQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F7672D9-91FE-4D0E-ADA0-69EB0C2438A9@ietf.org> <CABFReBq04ERNkhp412QAJM-tqLA0cUnjbj6FXqeXQTGaWC-yAA@mail.gmail.com> <AEA414AB-D633-4258-8BDE-7FB2F7B72651@ietf.org> <CA+wi2hOa4W+R+_DD3T7Cn90g5CL4YZ7HyTv8omVudvAzP2fZYA@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBrjbZPeqDrKZAfNw45t5qawRrCL53Xx60psongXgHQ_2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hPn200ZeToVU2CAYK=4LZkjTBRJpm9Zu1_q0xqVnOhJ7g@mail.gmail.com> <20200729144816.GB1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A61C6672-0337-4AEF-906F-3BB4C9C92806@fugue.com> <20200729150249.GC1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CA+RyBmU3DPbR7_CcimZz=0eRn+=uwtLgQnnR-fKDVOrQtin3zg@mail.gmail.com> <22D51C93-47BB-4F12-BBD0-41FBC760248B@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <22D51C93-47BB-4F12-BBD0-41FBC760248B@ietf.org>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:18:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVwdvz1cd4muDDwyyVAyRc66nY_uTs8WsfC8cJXwAcigw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072bd7705ab961343"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/uMVkI-1F0t-GNw6PMlS5orixtBA>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:19:15 -0000

Hi Jay,
it could be. I was not taking notes at the moment.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:13 AM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 30/07/2020, at 3:09 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On the first day of IETF-108 Meetcho closed the SPRING WG meeting on the
> clock. It was announced that five minutes grace period will be added. BIER
> meeting, to the best of my knowledge, was closed not at +5 but -5 minutes.
> Unannounced change of policy?
>
>
> Greg - are you sure it wasn’t five minutes before the top of the hour,
> which is five minutes after the meeting is scheduled to finish?
>
> Jay
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:03 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:56:02AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> > On Jul 29, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>> > > How is it possible that in a physcial meeting we are able to utilize
>> all possible
>> > > before andd after meeting times, and now going virtual where we
>> should have
>> > > FEWER time constraints, we enforce MORE ?
>> >
>> > Poor chair discipline does sometimes result in chairs trying to run
>> their meetings into the break. This is a failure on the part of the chairs,
>> not a feature.
>>
>> Sure, but are we trying to virtualize our common experiences,
>> requirements or
>> trying to create a more strict regime ?
>>
>> I see far fewer reasons for strict meetecho session limits than there are
>> fo physical rooms.
>>
>> Sorry, but this makes totally no sense to me.
>>
>> Cheers
>>     toerless
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>>
>> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
>> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
>> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>>
>> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
>> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
>>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
>
>
> --
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> jay@ietf.org
>
>