Re: [Tools-discuss] Zulip accounts and datatracker

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 19 May 2021 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2215D3A0CBE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 05:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.271
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.271 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwK36EZRdgg9 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 05:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6A83A0CC5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 05:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14JCnvhc014024 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 May 2021 07:49:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1621428599; bh=KdTfcwKfEubSU0REa3KQVGVnZz506V+600N24xJPW+c=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QUs7s83AlIphAMSMVfE8IkXZQTa1tZ6yOxAt6ywaMDIjt2RfpEJNaUEs1dLMuvLP6 XqREeohBCbd0Qny4MBdD7SGyD60GRabJE73SiAcC2DAw7fAouTqzdkAoeYXCmx2RPF dbIz3T2Yzv+Vy+hx5ginOCgotYsZ35X2959uUIco=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@mit.edu>
Cc: "April, Tim" <tapril@akamai.com>, Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <F86CEEB6-E65E-4DA8-A267-E278C8BD5B58@akamai.com> <31b4e8bb-3664-4524-b12e-727455e6a203@nostrum.com> <CADrHQ_2jDrMRpNH1oOv93WwUZOMbdmjYX+k0vsF3-ao_F3AaDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <60a3a6b2-527d-0e79-4f7a-670f3848b48f@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 07:49:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADrHQ_2jDrMRpNH1oOv93WwUZOMbdmjYX+k0vsF3-ao_F3AaDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DF305CCF5225122417EA57D8"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/uSwxcP2v7-xyw9z4reeMMjQQpVo>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Zulip accounts and datatracker
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 12:50:11 -0000

I'll set what's needed up and contact Mateusz and Tim directly with the 
details.

The general answer to the questions can be seen (with a little knowledge 
of oidc) at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/api/openid/.well-known/openid-configuration

RjS

On 5/18/21 9:45 PM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> Adding Mateusz, who works on authentication backends for Zulip.
>
> I expect we can just make this work via OpenID Connect; the Zulip 
> mobile apps are designed to support the web authentication flow, so if 
> we can make it work on web, it'll work on mobile too (The terminal app 
> doesn't support this flow yet, but it will).  If someone can share 
> details/documentation on what exactly DataTracker implements and how 
> to get a sandbox that can be developed against, Mateusz can look at 
> what needs to happen to support it in Zulip.  It might be only a 
> couple days' work if we have a way to test; a typical new 
> authentication backend for something supported by python-social-auth 
> is 150 lines of code, of which maybe 30 implement it and the rest are 
> tests and documentation.
>
> (I imagine that it'd work like our Google auth integration, 
> prepopulating the name and email address when someone makes an account).
>
>         -Tim Abbott
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 5/18/21 1:24 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>
>>     Hi there.  I’m one of those who wants Zulip to succeed.  Like
>>     most, however, I’m not up on the technical details.
>>
>>     Tim and Tim (heck, not unambiguous, nor is TimA :) know the
>>     technical details. I’ve CC’d both of them, anyway.
>>
>>     I know we’ve had some emails floating around about Zulip account
>>     issues and integrating with DataTracker. I’m just trying to tie
>>     all the threads together in the “official place” so that we can
>>     bring this to a close and get it working.
>>
>     In the spirit of moving some of those conversations to one place:
>
>     Datatracker integration with Zulip might be easier to solve than
>     jabber or imap (we have some integration with the latter, but it's
>     more custom than we should keep in the long run). It should be
>     easy for the web client to use oidc. If the mobile client is using
>     https underneath, it would probably be easy for it to use oidc as
>     well. Are there other interfaces that need to be considered?
>
>     If oidc isn't an option architecturally, then I'd like to explore
>     what might be.
>
>     In any case, I'd like to determine if we san set the displayed
>     username and the email address displayed when you inspect someone
>     in the Users list using data from the datatracker?
>
>     RjS
>
>>     Thanks. Let me know what I can do to help.
>>
>>
>>     ___________________________________________________________
>>     Tools-discuss mailing list -Tools-discuss@ietf.org  <mailto:Tools-discuss@ietf.org>
>>     This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
>>     * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to:datatracker-project@ietf.org  <mailto:datatracker-project@ietf.org>
>>     * Reporttools.ietf.org  <http://tools.ietf.org>  bugs to:webmaster@tools.ietf.org  <mailto:webmaster@tools.ietf.org>
>>     * Report all other bugs or issues to:ietf-action@ietf.org  <mailto:ietf-action@ietf.org>
>>     List info (including how to Unsubscribe):https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss  <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss