Re: [Tools-discuss] https://tools.ietf.org/agenda/110/calendar borked?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 02 March 2021 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEFF3A2578 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:51:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XhHNRGbXyOmZ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590DB3A2926 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.local ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 122FpVGM005386 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:51:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1614700292; bh=hhYer9nYHN6x1fNhIBCvqjCgo8COZiarXcj5jPHZfrw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=mk1ng5lBq28pLWN+U4Czo4Bme0eazlZQ1X44+VnZ4edjrhRqaSjGqg/MkkEiqWIcQ HqqFRC2dSsFviHkO4bqnskARxzytvEvGPznom2Fu20dUuy4DsOicmqz4EYS8X/lDVl 2+u6dtycGfBC2Kx5R7vVDNgHF+YP1bea8URMuMnY=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.local
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <fc77b99c-1b25-6d2d-40a5-81ad56c1f154@gmx.de> <0bc0f9f7-d80a-698d-856b-0fada6d1c886@nostrum.com> <38b37377-eba9-279e-9c48-72fbe57d31c2@gmx.de>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <1113cbec-169a-54c2-3c2c-8eabcde40324@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:51:26 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <38b37377-eba9-279e-9c48-72fbe57d31c2@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/vrjRcHfqpi38ZMOXtrjvt_UtH4M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] https://tools.ietf.org/agenda/110/calendar borked?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 15:51:44 -0000

On 3/2/21 9:45 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Am 02.03.2021 um 16:42 schrieb Robert Sparks:
>> Hi Julian -
>>
>> Are the ics available from the datatracker not filling a need?
>
> I can and will try.

If it's helpful, consider

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/agenda?show=webtrans

Use the "Customize agenda view" panel to tune what you want and don't 
want to appear in the calendar, then subscribe to (or download) the 
Customized schedule link.


>
> Is tools variant known to be broken?

It is supported by Henrik at best effort - I'll forward a note to him 
letting him know you've seen an issue.

>
> Best regards, Julian
>