[Tools-discuss] Re: ipv6-bounces <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 14 August 2024 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B10C14F708 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vpVNVwuisYWu for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF59C14F6FF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-70936061d0dso40044a34.2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723656687; x=1724261487; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SV6/kLIlLTtYICgS3z73+XWXkW5blqO2KDU6DWhkTjs=; b=Tmi3JgDwoJzeGLZHPV1WKPP1uh+YrAjxp2Wk/f66fHT0QyFCUIwueUNhdaXLRKYtr2 S2+E5DsHHkDwdOoGjuwdPXYLXTxjIUyW5UI4x+utKPcCYxNg7mEzE+jKj53+/ZLIaUCR 5qx8EvJi2MdLrUa/edas/eviDpr462fLh0+xXYFbMv+C6zJcbPIgpInLrPB11g+9qFSu FnKzXtPcNv84kwPre/sUjEE88KudnbBoSLgpjKhBL+U08WhfRBJGN7EOz8qE+3wZwsGp 1pooWKhhyC14WUJn/I1ZdmPUpVUiITuV5uH7OBqWgxC5+vsSs7D5OsBVrHU8Z/yNvnO0 0zYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723656687; x=1724261487; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SV6/kLIlLTtYICgS3z73+XWXkW5blqO2KDU6DWhkTjs=; b=piwCW+zlu//CgiodXf5rjm2mQ3cEIaRt69inTgf2PMZ7AdoXX/Zr8K0GO97OYAPLjV 9gY/1Yjds18BeTRda4s+w9JJrxuzhnLFpWEGSgTMRPrnx9qcmyM1DVUJ5oE+qa9m14tM u7Gh9MC+2lv1obhAhTieB1NN6sANbOWBQeKSaiwFyiGCm6CB2TnPo3tsMJKg2hhZ6VV/ XEtl/VZ7b7rQ25w92lahqAfckuNPhDRCvWgS1XG158FWg/fIgcFpC00fRZfLEEQRdmaP 8a0jLwcEJtHnMPZAGVK4Ur0PAfoRns+/ReOUc4EuV2zy79ca/UAXtuVbDQXBx2n76RPR CAXQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWNzZLhlJYHhqHpsqDNOKq7NuME01M8dOCAB5cLasF6bFWL98iOOjs34saCxLyk4yYywlJqatOccDjYS/zFOzIvYZiMiOjc
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxbFwvU9N5tddOMHG07tO5iEyryHdOZtt4SGp/LA6fGJivogPlw 6m7csWmJNF54BfaeujjqgPAA9RV33SLiP4zrSJ3MXnJkfBou4oxJN54QwA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFzWY7vK158+Mfz1GEojUJfzTOraktRZtniOSo3rz3rk0YNapa1wDhkNXtpCb5vZk8dwiu4iw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6c84:b0:708:e969:e0d9 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-70c9d969765mr4132068a34.17.1723656686647; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-31-208-116.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.31.208.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-70c7b89058esm2275055a34.71.2024.08.14.10.31.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABEF533D-1086-4D11-9F7A-E612B0BF20E3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c2d51a5c-46d9-4292-bb32-ea5a36ecc367@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:31:04 -0700
Message-Id: <F20216F3-8EA2-4357-A82B-AB5B3BA91B72@gmail.com>
References: <053D5ABB-BE8C-4289-BEFD-EA8D7E1646EB@gmail.com> <c2d51a5c-46d9-4292-bb32-ea5a36ecc367@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
Message-ID-Hash: ATCXN7STW6ONSIE2O23GY25QBTQIRKDM
X-Message-ID-Hash: ATCXN7STW6ONSIE2O23GY25QBTQIRKDM
X-MailFrom: bob.hinden@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: ipv6-bounces <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/xHoKwJ1sy3R1Gv-XcKf2yOMw4a8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

Thanks, I will forward you one directly.

Bob


> On Aug 14, 2024, at 10:25 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bob - sorry for the delayed reply - I don't see an attachment? (I think it's ok to send it to me directly rather than the list).
> 
> We'll queue this as something for Sirius to look at after the migration of the mail services is completed.
> 
> RjS
> 
> On 8/10/24 11:47 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We get periodic SPAM emails sent to the  ipv6-bounces <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> address.   They are forwarded to the ipv6-owners address.
>> 
>> The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce format
>> was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted from it.  This
>> mailing list has been configured to send all unrecognized bounce messages to
>> the list administrator(s).
>> 
>> I was wondering that if the bounce address should only be used by mailman, is there a way to configure it only accept from mailman?
>> 
>> I suspect this happens on many IETF lists.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/