IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Dates added: 6 and 7 Dec (was Re: Tools Workshop : Mail Processing either 22 or 23 Nov.)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 14 October 2021 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D133A16C7 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.081
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tLceeS0Fm_EV for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7583A16C5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 19EEHCli009420 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:17:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1634221034; bh=/e+MGT6yd6CK3Nt3JBvOIw5ur2hSWvKYIVBn0inYmng=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ZNz9G274+5MhAjgrZWaUF/DxXJRLFLfBlpkpidMsh0/vJKx0/44nhx8kPXV7uI6pe AdJX7Na53Oj87x3sVjNaqUX7WxU9812RB3Py/WrpBmYbeDlmPrFKK7wiOE1ly6NKOO gpFjDA3K9rpdX3ylBgEnHXIPWdo/SNmXprJPwsmg=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Message-ID: <7b838a0c-c914-b432-0eee-8e6952c6cd58@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:17:07 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20211014031201.B56272A51027@ary.qy>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211014031201.B56272A51027@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/zKAsRAT1sjpIp8WlQTVjfU_nC8M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Dates added: 6 and 7 Dec (was Re: Tools Workshop : Mail Processing either 22 or 23 Nov.)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:17:25 -0000

On 10/13/21 10:12 PM, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Robert Sparks  <rjsparks@nostrum.com> said:
>>> *    IDN support
>>>          What a Mailman 3 migration would require
>>>          What would be different with Mailman 3
>>>          what would have to change in the rest of the processing chain
> By IDN support, do you mean EAI mail with UTF-8 on both sides of an e-mail address, or just
> IDNs in URLs and the like?
>
> If you mean the former, RFC 6783 offers some advice but nowhere near enough.
>
> The old rule of thumb that the first 90% of the work takes the first 90% of the
> time, and then the other 90% of the work takes the other 90% of the time
> definitely applies here.

Indeed, and yes, we mean the former - it's a project that's had action 
on and off for several years. Its time to look again to see if we can 
finish taking the step.

I hope you'll be able to be at the workshop!

>
> R's,
> John
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status