Re: [Tools-implementation] Changing the id-announce template to remove ftp

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 23 October 2020 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B83C3A13B3 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKb4TTkPXujE for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2723A13B2 for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49506300BA6 for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id VlIWV9O1D67H for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76EC6300B31; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <42D68178-814E-45FB-BE46-63591AAF2FD7@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0F4F8628-DF5F-421B-B1A0-E46588939E81"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:17:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <07d3ab8d-360f-8765-30c5-c28a58773b2f@nostrum.com>
Cc: "tools-implementation@ietf.org" <tools-implementation@ietf.org>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <07d3ab8d-360f-8765-30c5-c28a58773b2f@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/eQ2QLWScVyM7GSR_6U_Gqv9Lq3c>
Subject: Re: [Tools-implementation] Changing the id-announce template to remove ftp
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:17:47 -0000

Robert:

> 
> All (but especially Roman:
> 
> I propose that we change the following text, that appears in the messages sent to i-d-announce:
> 
> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ <http://ftp//ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>To:
> 
> "Internet-Drafts are also via rsync at rsync.ietf.org::id-archive"
> 
> Note that earlier parts of the message already point to how to get drafts over https. (See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i-d-announce/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i-d-announce/> if you haven't looked at i-d-announce recently).
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1) I think we can just make this change. Do we need to give the IESG a heads up?
> 
Any change should go through the IESG.

> 2) The message points to the archive, and not the repository. There has been confusion about the distinction and having things point to the archive has helped resolve that. But, fwiw, there is also an rsync point for the repository. I don't think we should point there, but does anyone disagree?
> 
I agree with you.

Russ