[Tools-team] Re: 16ng analysis document revision
gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com> Fri, 12 January 2007 14:12 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5N9J-00080e-I7; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:12:53 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4j5F-0007vA-MO for tools-team@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:26:01 -0500
Received: from web81902.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4j5B-0004Xq-4e for tools-team@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:26:01 -0500
Received: (qmail 63689 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2007 19:25:56 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rDG8DetWJFp4rkoAacA5hzSiaDz95MfdXopH9lAvNr9+b6YFZ311yyjZHU2SXlBfPUapKUKbwuPi9aPWBZ3pPgJFPJnW7sR80uIQoparhiGN3iX8/Im7sFMopryPHDENE1tsorNELioaCyjzyAJ1NHKIOYEZJZCPcyaHIDJBMYU= ;
Message-ID: <20070110192556.63687.qmail@web81902.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [131.107.0.103] by web81902.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:25:56 PST
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:25:56 -0800
From: gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>
To: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>, tools-team@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 37af5f8fbf6f013c5b771388e24b09e7
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:12:52 -0500
Cc: Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: [Tools-team] Re: 16ng analysis document revision
X-BeenThere: tools-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The purpose of the TOOLS team is to provide IETF feedback and guidance during the development of software tools to support various parts of IETF activities." <tools-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-team>, <mailto:tools-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-team>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-team>, <mailto:tools-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1374260797=="
Errors-To: tools-team-bounces@ietf.org
[cc-ing tools-team] Hmmm... I got no such warnings at all from idnits 1.123 (same version you used) using the old RFC 3978 IPR statement. Can't explain why. I'm cc-ing the tools-team alias in case they know of a related issue and fix. If we don't hear back from them within a day or so, I'd suggest you go ahead and submit. Next revision (after Feb 1) can use the new boilerplate. tnx, -gabriel ----- Original Message ---- From: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com> To: gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com> Cc: Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 10:52:34 AM Subject: Re: 16ng analysis document revision Thank you Gabriel. I am now consistently getting the following but the the xml2rfc is not recognizing RFC 4748 as of now. Shall I go ahead and submit with RFC 3978 IPR statement? Regards, Syam idnits 1.123 tmp/draft-ietf-16ng-ipv6-link-model-analysis-02.txt: Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate... - This document has ISOC Copyright according to RFC 3978, instead of the newer IETF Trust Copyright according to RFC 4748. You should consider updating it; the new Copyright statement will be required from February 1st, 2007 - This document has an original RFC 3978 Section 5.5 Disclaimer, instead of the newer disclaimer which includes the IETF Trust according to RFC 4748. You should consider updating it; the new disclaimer will be required from February 1st, 2007 Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of 1id-guidelines.txt yet). Miscellaneous warnings: None. Experimental warnings: None. No nits found. On 1/10/07, gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Syam, > > The offending line was #400 in a diagram. Turns out other diagrams also went > beyond the 70 characters. To bring them back in I replaced "To Internet" > with > "Internet" in the diagrams and now ID nits passes cleanly. > > I attach the resultant xml and .txt files. > > I used xml2rfc from: > > http://xml.resource.org/ > > I used IDnits from: > > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ > > The output (verbose) was: > > idnits 1.123 > > tmp/draft-ietf-16ng-ipv6-link-model-analysis-02.txt.txt: > > > > Checking nits according to > http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: > > Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate... > > the boilerplate looks good. > > No nits found. > > Checking nits according to > http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: > Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of > 1id-guidelines.txt yet). > > Miscellaneous warnings: > None. > > Experimental warnings: > None. > > No nits found. > > -gabriel >
_______________________________________________ Tools-team mailing list Tools-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-team
- [Tools-team] Re: 16ng analysis document revision gabriel montenegro
- Re: [Tools-team] Re: 16ng analysis document revis… Henrik Levkowetz