Re: [Tools-team] link to rfc editor queue points to wrong queue

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Thu, 26 January 2012 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607DF21F8661 for <tools-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:31:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.725
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.725 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EEvm0BeLoFba; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991AB21F865E; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e] (port=51856 helo=brunello.netnod.se) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1RqQM9-0004z2-9T; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:31:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4F2163B4.9070202@levkowetz.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:31:16 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F607204C@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F607204C@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com, tools-team@ietf.org, rfc-editor@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); Unknown failure
Cc: "tools-team@ietf.org" <tools-team@ietf.org>, "rfc-editor@ietf.org" <rfc-editor@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-team] link to rfc editor queue points to wrong queue
X-BeenThere: tools-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The purpose of the TOOLS team is to provide IETF feedback and guidance during the development of software tools to support various parts of IETF activities." <tools-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-team>, <mailto:tools-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-team>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-team>, <mailto:tools-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:31:22 -0000

Hi Sandy,

On 2012-01-13 20:48 Murphy, Sandra said:
> On the tools site, the wg status pages (eg
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr) have a section for drafts in the
> RFC-Editor's queue.
> 
> The URL used points to queue.html.  That page exists (and is kept
> current), but had been replaced by queue2.html.  The two are very
> similar but the queue2 page contains more info.
> 
> E.g., the link on http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr for the architecture
> draft points to
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html#draft-ietf-sidr-arch while the
> link on http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/ points to
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue2.html#draft-ietf-sidr-arch.
> 
> Right now, a bunch of documents are in auth48, and the queue2 page
> has a link to a page indicating which authors have responded.
> queue.html is missing this link.
> 
> I find the tools page very useful and tend to use that page more than
> the datatracker page.  But the queue2 link to the author responses is
> very very helpful.  Would be very very good if the tools page pointed
> to the queue2 page (to spare me the pain of remembering to check
> both).

Fixed in the template source.  Should be visible on individual WG pages
within about an hour.

> (Don't think I'm not appreciative of the tools team work.  I am.
> Very very.)

Thank you :-)


Best regards,

	Henrik