Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6268)
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 23 September 2020 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD71A3A0FC2 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4aoVWM2D3Cu for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr60068.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.6.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6438E3A0DCD for <tram@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=X3/m7KqfvuqJtHtNqZtSSVT6BUlaBffT2v7l+myo5iBCmjcWlgTy7mNCKTRoTCNVd7o10BG68A6Yiq+IZLl+NT4l1mv1NYtJNmt2TX7U5OW7UpKvkM8IWEx+5l5RJQAe6y4mYA3Vv/6X4K/E/BhUdpCglPkSlo+Fz4F7E59ZPY3wkgXpCdtX71MG/+PDgeN9GKioCZrbmsTBMivIhc2jrrMPqvu7Lv7eeaWQmx5hWsa6f765pbA6n5u/d5uJ+rfe04i3ugLmvvCL/vJrSYdbcFsLXeNRw6xHrTFN2oUZI0dRt8I8BFmL9byl8CKlF7exAx5mO+jIvPIXu2pqjbwCmw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M8QRL1Xhg8FBv77eUojQkn6Zk8vywXELEIw5O6wjCyw=; b=cx3UF+rXK/HFMEFTvd3mIuJvApuuF30MXWrCiVjfc0EeYsuEzHGQLFL/C+oMoTru+0aK/sINmom2nBdgypW+A/w5W3ejLzQVmrsFDscoxr8MghdnGOMbk20a6yFZGid87ZljRBve4VLeqS1pXMeHkC2+Po+1P3h7iRFkDXvgMOKExVX9iPFtgVxBrbl/EVpd78RYhlm79M04KOI/8GZEMyBxB3A/uwOrKRuz5AmKSBDPNLIEJIw81NwVkrcz6Ve7QMa4pt08Y/0OvdSG8rLJnaBpPTsMEarjZ+HwZYqUCBlojsoSxZRwc66ea5KC6fxVnw1sM/YccI4lzk87Q9XzHQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M8QRL1Xhg8FBv77eUojQkn6Zk8vywXELEIw5O6wjCyw=; b=TnMZLX6xfEutHrkqTmAqJdJyWrKU9OC0U1VabcvODlwqwyKCG4cgNg0Uw5fSbN0YtMJ4pGXEyKvGqw5v47L4ZwEkrXzU3U4Ib208eb3dvb5KCHmUKuDYxwYOhWRLgtgaXDaZMNXL5/HQHisqrNZ9i5W/aj3FBpf8016U1/Ae6hs=
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:8e::14) by HE1PR07MB4219.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:9f::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.4; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:18:19 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c98a:9a0c:1eea:3fdc]) by HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c98a:9a0c:1eea:3fdc%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3412.021; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:18:19 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: "renthraysk@gmail.com" <renthraysk@gmail.com>, "marc@petit-huguenin.org" <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
CC: "jdrosen@jdrosen.net" <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>, "martin.h.duke@gmail.com" <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, "dwing-ietf@fuggles.com" <dwing-ietf@fuggles.com>, "philip_matthews@magma.ca" <philip_matthews@magma.ca>, "rohan.ietf@gmail.com" <rohan.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6268)
Thread-Index: AQHWfuF5dRZ7aF/vA0OYP087ogZzZKlSU3kAgAAfVoCAAS6igIAJpSSAgAARDgCAAA2PgIAAAGWQgAACowCACswlAIAAGeGAgAASQACADgqBAA==
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:18:19 +0000
Message-ID: <4fb78f8080c69a727fb392d1c4462ffa63fe45c2.camel@ericsson.com>
References: <20200830152251.37CA9F4076B@rfc-editor.org> <bd82edbe82f83f7c92c6cb21924951d35132768f.camel@ericsson.com> <B09AFC19-A790-46C5-A97B-69572411A229@cisco.com> <7bbe51fd9a5a226752597825f276f6baad70add7.camel@ericsson.com> <f48eb512-5c17-20bd-dfd6-2d368e9fd4b9@petit-huguenin.org> <CABNgG1g3Tx1QroP+eo+WeQXxD2XPvf+n67pekBqRi8+QzgX8_Q@mail.gmail.com> <65838ad3-7ee9-3339-1326-8c2d212f6fa6@petit-huguenin.org> <HE1PR0702MB3772F26F7B3E91B8DC6982D695280@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <d0498051-d762-855d-bf74-d65a8bdf88da@petit-huguenin.org> <b3cae3bd-2b7f-d8c5-fcb4-55be9f11a3ce@petit-huguenin.org> <CABNgG1hzNyM-qqCpprXBUJ4y-X7OOMZHK72wpPL_rJ+TLXrz-g@mail.gmail.com> <4803aae689ab3839beb9f2a65762001495bc31f8.camel@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4803aae689ab3839beb9f2a65762001495bc31f8.camel@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.81]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5c25004c-77a7-443e-b041-08d85fcb85aa
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB4219:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB4219D23E3B87BDD30A39554195380@HE1PR07MB4219.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: UqlCgdkeImve2zVky+Uh9gJHIskSjG78YfZ1wi23y90H58HExpg8PnS+JprFZnjcT+xapDy6+HXrqgLIxoYACMVeXpSpX5A2ql+3UaHW0CXCWt3esI3hHRA3WAYbH178xI7OF/lN/2+fF1f9fgFCBpbp9V4gBEsn5mLWqoXlOC7r4y7+p9dbp3Wjs4zAG0i93yf0pz9LN9qgFaMrpYC4/4aeeCP07vqoLf2cFI3C/bSw0zktjI5T9W/N5L7DkcHChGtuLZqpZykzDYcSTijs+pc3rBW9rprw9vPLKzDu51U8jOxFFVMHAkuQzPukLVo2mdQhzYeazjzO0+9pv58Ohdjh9MSvXjEdLxBaxrxc/1ZkpqL/zKINVavvXO1U4CoCqZTsjYhu6iYnVCDk3EE9WZUC6z/hBlKvqHkQhH3m8OLFCPbWspTKLkjzemBLmaCVBGzR28XUNkDJ2398Po/tsA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(8676002)(36756003)(316002)(83380400001)(66476007)(8936002)(91956017)(64756008)(66446008)(30864003)(76116006)(66946007)(478600001)(2906002)(44832011)(5660300002)(2616005)(66556008)(4326008)(26005)(6512007)(966005)(110136005)(16799955002)(71200400001)(86362001)(54906003)(6506007)(53546011)(186003)(6486002)(99106002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <05712099AC9E5A449DAA16A8F30CCD7A@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5c25004c-77a7-443e-b041-08d85fcb85aa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Sep 2020 14:18:19.6791 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 2L9H1A54e/rNay9qtcKLls78pdOKq5exnCZUdM+kruZqHGOPx7X8v5zc5flY8k+dMCCKYuzDrKeLmrhhRIWzvVOjdh7bn/Wp9RINIrMsVXI=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB4219
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/-gNlwQvT7XDRJk7H-MyYh5Bo4YY>
Subject: Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6268)
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:18:27 -0000
Jared, Any follow up on the the below question? I would like to conclude on this Errata. /Magnus On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 15:53 +0000, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Marc for the new test vector. > > Thanks Jared for verifying it. > > I have updated the Errata with Marc latest test vector. > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=c2b8810a-9c18434c-c2b8c191-86fc6812c361-deb1c6e569244be5&q=1&e=1eef972f-1e6d-4430-97e5-2b968535970d&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata_search.php%3Feid%3D6268 > > Please check this. > > Jared, I don't understand your request about noting SHA-256 password > algorithm. > To me it appears very clear in this section and in the message exactly what > protocol elements are being used. USERHASH and MESSAGE-INTEGRITY-SHA256 are > both > clear that they use SHA256. So if you want any change to the note, can you > provide what text you propse? > > > B.1. Sample Request with Long-Term Authentication with MESSAGE- > INTEGRITY-SHA256 and USERHASH > > This request uses the following parameters: > > Username: "<U+30DE><U+30C8><U+30EA><U+30C3><U+30AF><U+30B9>" (without > quotes) unaffected by OpaqueString [RFC8265] processing > > Password: "The<U+00AD>M<U+00AA>tr<U+2168>" and "TheMatrIX" (without > quotes) respectively before and after OpaqueString [RFC8265] > processing > > Nonce: "obMatJos2AAACf//499k954d6OL34oL9FSTvy64sA" (without quotes) > > Realm: "example.org" (without quotes) > > > > > On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 15:47 +0100, RenThraysk wrote: > > Hi > > > > Ok, this is using the SHA256 Password Algorithm, so I suggest that should be > > noted in the errata as part of the parameters listed in B.1 > > But can now successfully create the test vector from my code. > > > > Will open the other > > errata proposing to strike the line about the right to left bit ordering. > > > > Jared > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:15 PM Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org > > > > > wrote: > > > After looking at the emails exchanged at that time, the reason the > > > userhash > > > was different was because we tentatively changed the username during > > > AUTH48, > > > then decided to use the original one, but my code got stuck with the new > > > username. I updated the code and the test-vector is now: > > > > > > 00 01 00 88 Request type and message length > > > 21 12 a4 42 Magic cookie > > > 78 ad 34 33 } > > > c6 ad 72 c0 } Transaction ID > > > 29 da 41 2e } > > > 00 1e 00 20 USERHASH attribute header > > > 4a 3c f3 8f } > > > ef 69 92 bd } > > > a9 52 c6 78 } > > > 04 17 da 0f } Userhash value (32 bytes) > > > 24 81 94 15 } > > > 56 9e 60 b2 } > > > 05 c4 6e 41 } > > > 40 7f 17 04 } > > > 00 15 00 29 NONCE attribute header > > > 6f 62 4d 61 } > > > 74 4a 6f 73 } > > > 32 41 41 41 } > > > 43 66 2f 2f } > > > 34 39 39 6b } Nonce value and padding (3 bytes) > > > 39 35 34 64 } > > > 36 4f 4c 33 } > > > 34 6f 4c 39 } > > > 46 53 54 76 } > > > 79 36 34 73 } > > > 41 00 00 00 } > > > 00 14 00 0b REALM attribute header > > > 65 78 61 6d } > > > 70 6c 65 2e } Realm value (11 bytes) and padding (1 byte) > > > 6f 72 67 00 } > > > 00 1c 00 20 MESSAGE-INTEGRITY-SHA256 attribute header > > > 23 41 12 fb } > > > d4 e2 7f 98 } > > > 3e b4 03 28 } > > > 36 f9 98 21 } HMAC-SHA256 value > > > 6f 5b 23 f8 } > > > d9 27 75 3f } > > > bc 4f 88 2b } > > > fb df 0d ec } > > > > > > > > > I think that the note in the errata is fine (after updating the test- > > > vector). > > > > > > Let's open a separate errata for the other issue. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > On 9/7/20 9:21 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > > > > Yes, I will provide text. > > > > > > > > On 9/7/20 9:13 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I will hold, but please consider if you directly have any text > > > > > proposal > > > > > > for > > > > > the note part of the errata to explain the changes that are in there > > > > > and > > > > > > if we > > > > > need to change the text above the message itself to clarify thingS? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > Magnus > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> > > > > > > Sent: den 7 september 2020 18:11 > > > > > > To: RenThraysk <renthraysk@gmail.com> > > > > > > Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>; > > > > > > gsalguei@cisco.com; simon.perreault@logmein.com; > > > > > > martin.h.duke@gmail.com; philip_matthews@magma.ca; Gonzalo Camarillo > > > > > > <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>; jdrosen@jdrosen.net; dwing- > > > > > > ietf@fuggles.com; tram@ietf.org; rohan.ietf@gmail.com > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6268) > > > > > > > > > > > > That's a good question. We changed the username after we discovered > > > > > > that > > > > > > the one I used previously was in fact invalid with the new PRECIS > > > > > > rules, > > > > > > but > > > > > > I > > > > > > am not sure why the one in the RFC is different. I'll have to look > > > > > > into > > > > > > my > > > > > > archives to find exactly what is what, but that will have to wait > > > > > > until > > > > > > next > > > > > > Monday morning. > > > > > > > > > > > > Meanwhile, Magnus, please hold on the errata modification. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/7/20 8:22 AM, RenThraysk wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why has the Userhash value changed from the original test vector? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:21 PM Marc Petit-Huguenin > > > > > > > <marc@petit-huguenin.org> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Magnus, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the corrected test-vector: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <begins> > > > > > > > > 00 01 00 88 Request type and message length > > > > > > > > 21 12 a4 42 Magic cookie > > > > > > > > 78 ad 34 33 } > > > > > > > > c6 ad 72 c0 } Transaction ID > > > > > > > > 29 da 41 2e } > > > > > > > > 00 1e 00 20 USERHASH attribute header > > > > > > > > 63 aa 09 fc } > > > > > > > > 23 81 0a 46 } > > > > > > > > c9 76 e9 59 } > > > > > > > > 23 10 ee 1e } Userhash value (32 bytes) > > > > > > > > 59 b7 06 e1 } > > > > > > > > 9d e1 bd 21 } > > > > > > > > a9 f6 f7 40 } > > > > > > > > 28 d5 ba 71 } > > > > > > > > 00 15 00 29 NONCE attribute header > > > > > > > > 6f 62 4d 61 } > > > > > > > > 74 4a 6f 73 } > > > > > > > > 32 41 41 41 } > > > > > > > > 43 66 2f 2f } > > > > > > > > 34 39 39 6b } Nonce value and padding (3 bytes) > > > > > > > > 39 35 34 64 } > > > > > > > > 36 4f 4c 33 } > > > > > > > > 34 6f 4c 39 } > > > > > > > > 46 53 54 76 } > > > > > > > > 79 36 34 73 } > > > > > > > > 41 00 00 00 } > > > > > > > > 00 14 00 0b REALM attribute header > > > > > > > > 65 78 61 6d } > > > > > > > > 70 6c 65 2e } Realm value (11 bytes) and padding (1 > > > > > > > > byte) > > > > > > > > 6f 72 67 00 } > > > > > > > > 00 1c 00 20 MESSAGE-INTEGRITY-SHA256 attribute header > > > > > > > > 8e 57 3d 97 } > > > > > > > > 75 33 21 ae } > > > > > > > > 47 8c b6 a2 } > > > > > > > > 7b 8a 6b 3a } HMAC-SHA256 value > > > > > > > > 89 08 9e e1 } > > > > > > > > 5f 62 6b 38 } > > > > > > > > 40 9f 48 ed } > > > > > > > > 47 a5 df 57 } > > > > > > > > <ends> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/1/20 4:04 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it is reasonable that we do an RFC Errata for this > > > > > > > > > error to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > provide a > > > > > > > > > corrected test vector. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can edit the Errata request to have a different text. So if > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > authors could > > > > > > > > > prepare and review a proposal that fixes this I will edit and > > > > > > approve > > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if you can provide the text that goes into the three parts: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Original Text: (I assume the full message from B.1 here) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Corrected Text: Full message with corrected message length and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomputed Hash > > > > > > > > > value. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notes: If there are any additional that was already written > > > > > > > > > that you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like to > > > > > > > > > remark about this error? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Magnus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 17:00 +0000, Gonzalo Salgueiro > > > > > > > > > (gsalguei) > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Magnus - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc responded earlier so you may have missed it. Below is > > > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > response: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > This errata is correct, and there is nobody to blame for > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > mistake > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Magnus, how to you want to proceed for the recomputed test > > > > > > > > > > vector? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > +++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gonzalo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 2020, at 11:08 AM, Magnus Westerlund < > > > > > > > > > > > magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Author's can you please confirm if this is correct or not? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Magnus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:22 -0700, RFC Errata System > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for > > > > > > > > > > > > RFC8489, > > > > > > > > > > > > "Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > You may review the report below and at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=99260d6d-c786cf2b-99264df6-86fc > > > > > > > > 6812c361-2320f3daa9544fe5&q=1&e=c28eb099-e321-4447-80c3- > > > > > > > > > > > > 942509fe0974& > > > > > > > > u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6268 > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > Type: Technical > > > > > > > > > > > > Reported by: Jared Williams <renthraysk@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Section: Appendix B.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Original Text > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > 00 01 00 9c Request type and message length > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Corrected Text > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > 00 01 00 88 Request type and message length > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notes > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > The message length in the test vector (9c) is the > > > > > > > > > > > > absolute length > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > whole > > > > > > > > > > > > test vector. However from section 5. STUN Message > > > > > > > > > > > > Structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "The message length MUST contain the size of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > in bytes, > > > > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > including the 20-byte STUN header." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the message length in the header should be 20 less > > > > > > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > absolute > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > length > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > the whole message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0x9C - 20, 0x88. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also the MESSAGE-INTEGRITY-SHA256 HMAC-SHA256 value of > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Test > > > > > > > > > > > > Vector will need recomputing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instructions: > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary, > > > > > > > > > > > > please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be > > > > > > > > > > > > verified > > > > > > > > > > > > or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying > > > > > > > > > > > > party can > > > > > > > > > > > > log in to change the status and edit the report, if > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > RFC8489 (draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-21) > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > Title : Session Traversal Utilities for > > > > > > > > > > > > NAT (STUN) > > > > > > > > > > > > Publication Date : February 2020 > > > > > > > > > > > > Author(s) : M. Petit-Huguenin, G. Salgueiro, > > > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > Rosenberg, > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > Wing, > > > > > > > > > > > > R. Mahy, P. Matthews > > > > > > > > > > > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > > > > > > > > > > > Source : TURN Revised and Modernized > > > > > > > > > > > > Area : Transport > > > > > > > > > > > > Stream : IETF > > > > > > > > > > > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Magnus Westerlund > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Networks, Ericsson Research ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Mobile +46 73 0949079 Torshamnsgatan 23 | SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6268) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… RenThraysk
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… RenThraysk
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Rohan Mahy
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… RenThraysk
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… RenThraysk
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… RenThraysk
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8489 (6… Magnus Westerlund