IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-thomson-tram-turn-bandwidth-00.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 18 February 2014 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68FC1A0296 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:35:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjBOG7EQLiUb for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B691A0268 for <tram@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Tpgg1n00617dt5G5Byb4NZ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:35:04 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Tyb41n00k3ZTu2S3Zyb4An; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:35:04 +0000
Message-ID: <5303E018.6040405@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:35:04 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com>
References: <20140214030712.30321.21888.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKhHsXGzA=ZTFGTK7ht9hQbfG70iqKrDtxrZCdQNNMzBYZCk8A@mail.gmail.com> <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE224412306@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <5303A4DE.8090500@viagenie.ca> <CALDtMrKN8hhDVLZQnPjPNkA=vBe0mznfxDpiAOx=uhkmw8PUHQ@mail.gmail.com> <5303D18C.5030705@viagenie.ca> <CALDtMr+0H=Qf7PxWD2=QpjCE9gTAFn9tWcjkkoaZyXfepAQHKw@mail.gmail.com> <5303D8D2.5080003@alum.mit.edu> <CALDtMrKAnKhet_SF+g1tFZqDo9q7Nph0zyE0cZ63_ZEdkVAALw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALDtMrKAnKhet_SF+g1tFZqDo9q7Nph0zyE0cZ63_ZEdkVAALw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1392762904; bh=tqx8xMXOQj/tMl9vb9mkoXN0KBTlnn6MMbKSBcegtlU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=sK8wD1qPw9IrnUcvRajLue/ooN4TnWiOM+CWlN7qYAeZvdsAeEJis/Ef48GD0B47+ S2hJrCWLUmc7ZVLwWiHJG2NSma58yHbgGDbVq8DxehWvRoUeYyZ18o+UpZ0TS/yndt fqrAryxsWZ5U1IMgL1rF6aeMN/sWAot9C3C+oshkzp+z8InPxmFHHbalcKWpMqzpnj yb06Os9th2hKIM6MAY5505Jo+Ukbw124WCzD1/nJpSZmhUluLEY/E3wGSArkCNfUkA Tp2n7trM2OzEWftvyqr9+k2ut20p6TUrwA/jaM38YnlE6SnuYidXj9wrGIm6q4qYR/ S/v7YMEGW+c4Q==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/6x-Ri9KnAD9NmCVPfs-eGw-xfiw
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-thomson-tram-turn-bandwidth-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:35:10 -0000

On 2/18/14 5:08 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
> TURN/STUN has been a binary protocol, so far... bringing SDP into the
> picture would make it too complicated.

I didn't mean that. I just meant that the taxonomy could potentially be 
adopted in some way.

(Whether that is a good idea is another story. I haven't followed the 
work closely. It isn't obvious to me that the particular taxonomy is 
well justified.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Thanks
> Oleg
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu
> <mailto:pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:
>
>     On 2/18/14 4:46 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
>
>
>
>
>         On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Perreault
>         <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
>         <mailto:simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
>         <mailto:simon.perreault@__viagenie.ca
>         <mailto:simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>>> wrote:
>
>              Le 2014-02-18 16:12, Oleg Moskalenko a écrit :
>
>
>              Anyway, I was expecting responses along the lines of
>         "DiffServ doesn't
>              work on the Internet in general." To which I would have
>         replied: "then
>              couldn't we define a STUN attribute for transporting the
>         DSCP in the
>              payload?" Instead of inventing a new taxonomy (audio,
>         video, slides,
>              etc.), why not reuse DSCP?
>
>
>
>         That would make sense - as s solution that does not require the TURN
>         server to be too smart but that allows some "easy" traffic
>         engineering.
>
>
>     There is draft-ietf-mmusic-traffic-__class-for-sdp-04 (recently
>     expired).
>
>     It would have to be adapted to be fitted into TURN, but it provides
>     a taxonomy.
>
>              Thanks,
>              Paul
>
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     tram mailing list
>     tram@ietf.org <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/tram
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email