IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] draft-ietf-tram-turnbis

Noriyuki Torii <torii0573@gmail.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <torii0573@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CBF124F57; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLPXz9enec4u; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22f.google.com (mail-ot0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5234D1250B8; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 79so17143053oth.11; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0BWgmpovPGSAnqOx4qEB9AMYSn9pu/SQltvcJV4eIiA=; b=ftASsw3BZS8b5H/KlrUB6ARMCXGqHVW6Hnvkv0CWuMIDNeVYE207Y6Js4LXSYk+XzY q4CefuxoWJuqefukzXITOoglEHeXwVhSjea4gUuDAQm7zgYeG/2vDUXrAyglpGh6fwbA Nhi9CcE1yZwtX8y0zu/Aak7bOD01hTz37Kr7lcEJhujPcswySh6QtmEQkoWulS6ZIDQQ PhvIip0kms6Ee2A365vCYcaEsHWF6DOnvqmG+FqzLHkHBNsUt4qbMunBHVzCj1e554qB jSFi64LvPR9Q8fqZtqaasWHZK+80RdAzE2D/oT0hP+ryFlIMvEdgKO5LBog0nMFsbbwx wCZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0BWgmpovPGSAnqOx4qEB9AMYSn9pu/SQltvcJV4eIiA=; b=o19lFFlQJqTSQKpNuEOWFotQqBN2Qxq88+ZdF2rWfCnjDUvqqlspK0y6R7m792Fbc8 eXyU3XN6QcQ1MurYdsiiayjXWTS6iOE3OcILGHsgtfcvuqQ4SlW/DeYiJagDGU7Y6xUw LYOcCb965tGbxERqxrREFTqoevzTquXoH7QLWxBSwTr8hNdZ6UzyPgWIsUhm26rgXXQs BNgEcT5Q6IXQwjrUorU47pxDuSaCijz8ta+kZ4Cam3B4fQlDIuP23WFRyuJ7sgjb+huZ 39d+hZrOlAbj2bTBktmxy43eIjIlDf8Z50j15QYtOg86byGqyzRV7MUjoClUo0QX3w+N QYfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7F0Gi7E/t6V3Gt9dwpfq2aMf4O8ejldEYzH46dPdukmppWb6XkX DHECowC4qt8J7tQ3PVryXmN/Fjpx3ECEZ48vEDnRxLR1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsy9eCNlCwjBpS+pODip9/Zt9sqlwLUNxzQDKKl+9raZxcte0yv2/mVVjBKq4/rxTjlpyKKuP3DchAOMK7Wong=
X-Received: by 10.157.75.130 with SMTP id k2mr7062494otf.244.1520899540608; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.201.67.77 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ca9334ec-aa8c-55bd-3180-7086cd21952c@akamai.com>
References: <CABEjbRKS04Wx-L3eKJBNFbsNywZe_19X2NY++3NSovr_3viJWg@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR16MB1425EF492922CE97B6CF256CEAD30@BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> <ca9334ec-aa8c-55bd-3180-7086cd21952c@akamai.com>
From: Noriyuki Torii <torii0573@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:05:40 +0900
Message-ID: <CABEjbR+FGyu2gxs5KGucsqSByQpbC2T=-S3WZ2gt9qJt-BnotQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "draft-ietf-tram-turnbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tram-turnbis@ietf.org>
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/7e_isNi6hluYj42g9mi2QhCacUs>
Subject: Re: [tram] draft-ietf-tram-turnbis
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:05:43 -0000

Hi Brandon,

Thanks for your complementary note.
Truly, it is what I would like to say in the previous post.

Regards,
Noriyuki Torii

2018-03-13 1:02 GMT+09:00 Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>:
> Hi Tiru,
>
> I think that Torii's point is that according to stunbis section 9.2.5 a
> request that contains PASSWORD-ALGORITHM will also contain
> PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS, echoing back the value contained in the response. The
> example in section 18 does not show this.
>
> --Brandon
>
>
> On 03/12/2018 09:34 AM, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Noriyuki Torii
>>> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 12:40 PM
>>> To: draft-ietf-tram-turnbis@ietf.org
>>> Cc: tram@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [tram] draft-ietf-tram-turnbis
>>>
>>> To whom it may concern.
>>>
>>> I found some discrepancies in the draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-14.
>>> Hope this may help for improvement.
>>>
>>> - Section 12 defines the allowed channel numbers as below,
>>>
>>>   >      0x4000 through 0x7FFF: These values are the allowed channel
>>>   >      numbers (16,384 possible values).
>>>
>>>   but the RFC 7983 shrinks the valid range of channel number to 0x4000 -
>>> 0x4FFF.
>>>   Please see also
>>>   https://www.iana.org/assignments/stun-parameters/stun-
>>> parameters.xhtml#turn-channel
>>
>>
>> Thanks, fixed.
>>
>>>
>>> - STUNbis specification requires that PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS and
>>> PASSWORD-
>>>    ALGORITHM attributes are both present or neither not present in each
>>>    request, from my understandings.
>>>    If so, the section 18 needs refinements to reflect the above
>>> requirement,
>>>    because some example requests shown in the current document only have
>>>    PASSWORD-ALGORITHM and doesn't have PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS.
>>
>>
>> Section 18 discusses both PASSWORD-ALGORITHM and PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS (sent
>> in Allocate error response).
>>
>> -Tiru
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Noriyuki Torii
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tram mailing list
>>> tram@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tram mailing list
>> tram@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>>
>

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email