Re: [tram] BCP over TURN will not be in scope ... and MPLS over UDP over TURN will not be in scope ... and ...

[Simon Perreault <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Spencer.

Please everyone also keep in mind that there's a big difference between
what is allowed to be discussed on the mailing list, where a very
liberal view of what is "on topic" usually applies, and what actually
gets agenda time, milestones, and adopted drafts, which is handled much
more strictly.

Simon

Le 2014-02-25 21:52, Spencer Dawkins a écrit :
> So ... TRAM was chartered last Thursday ...
> 
> I'm gonna let Gonzalo (Yet Another Soon-to-be Former AD Serving as WG
> Chair) and Simon actually chair their working group for at least a full
> week before intruding further, but for now, let's assume that the
> working group wants to work on the milestones they signed up for last
> week, and see how badly that assumption blows up, rather than talk about
> rechartering every time someone proposes a topic that's out of scope.
> 
> I look forward to attending the first working group session next week,
> and to balloting on six TRAM drafts before IETF 92.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer, as the responsible AD

-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca