Re: [tram] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10: (with COMMENT)

"Felipe Garrido (fegarrid)" <fegarrid@cisco.com> Thu, 14 November 2019 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fegarrid@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD79F120164; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:29:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=So+g9uYR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=DrJpXzp9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tq2UimhFFHqr; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB601200E9; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:29:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17847; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1573720183; x=1574929783; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=F93lSK0DJsU3DSdrnLvIaQA1DbTPa+T4lDX1h3aQ+xo=; b=So+g9uYRAWnE1r//NJj1/z7XEU4O+j9vniM0j3E6xW1SUQjBsRIea7WL 5+/4MUNt3khnj+4zuWvzzRDFzIS+FaWNWf12LCsojb2tAE94Hj+jdo+jq gkgwam0yuw9ensU5+SS+Y0zhl7Wfu1o/xnVTJe1r3BWKl2dM1pKfWbFol U=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A4y7cWh/gJSdzA/9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ65?= =?us-ascii?q?0hzqhDabmn44+8ZR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUER?= =?us-ascii?q?oMiMEYhQslVcCIBkThNv/mRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DLAAB6D81d/4wNJK1kGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF+gRwvJCwFbFggBAsqCoQfg0YDineCXpMehGK?= =?us-ascii?q?BQoEQA1QJAQEBDAEBIwoCAQGEQAIXgggkOBMCAwsBAQQBAQECAQUEbYU3AQu?= =?us-ascii?q?FUQEBAQEDEhEdAQE3AQ8CAQYCEQMBAigDAgICMBQJCAIEDgUigwABgXlNAy4?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgyWFpBjAoE4iGB1gTKCfgEBBYFIQYMIGIIXAwaBNowVGIFAP4ERJx+CTD6?= =?us-ascii?q?CYgIBAgGBKgESAQk2DQmCWjKCLI0ngmmFQ5hMCoIqhxiOMxuCPodjj2GOR4g?= =?us-ascii?q?4kUsCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiZ1gRCHAVZQGCQVARFJEaOIM7hRSFP3QBgSeOGoE?= =?us-ascii?q?iAYEOAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,302,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="667753035"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Nov 2019 08:29:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (xch-rcd-018.cisco.com [173.37.102.28]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAE8Tfmo032012 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:29:41 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:29:40 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:29:40 -0600
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:29:40 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=AYUZOiBpcFOphtzjsPX81it749Ia6Lrp+YwNjLfU5bb+wEfmHSAKWE0KA48feztCzADSL1x8gVUNk7UTzDBOyouY+rK8Kq/w2aZJPjBRWGhvJUkOOO2V0KVWsrnX+Ysid2Ta0TCRUx7VXLC5rrf+NCe5Z5N0Z+vDgeUhsRwBvZ6/Bf8w0aUaP3CbSEpIHrsQhhgRMgejRMJkh4hZDIdVP/LzW9mIwVQZFmwaKCy1IF7Kzav8XFu1dwbgeaCq0+0y9QsQXvKyK+2XxX5tYEfWxOzTp5mJbSJMcfIhpJHI2BsnfQQQ6C+DoMRAGsXRhiJxRCS4FuyzvZY2TZi+BXZD0Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=F93lSK0DJsU3DSdrnLvIaQA1DbTPa+T4lDX1h3aQ+xo=; b=ipI5KYa0XcPx+Llg/xHjMVO8KcSumVL0r1nMPtUpwuvo+cmfgPj9LAkuY4BhUYtoXly1FDBE19XKjpadTF/6SwjmQRk6Hywrg4HJGbXxCIZycjYFhrTCuJ2FD9wNSbDzk0F6pCBN38ryKFYhZOPO2NZaLmFaBRldqBPP7gvrT8n0mIhyYbWMUQCvUEsQvyo8t7RURv/XnZRARaPzGVPm43242yUby5WqqlG538wenXyvdJEeXoM/yCHHPihDpDwIBksnuX3Fx1WJgEJ5ceTZ4CGGXaztpXdM+bls7ShIfFSBwl+SfMqKuy9dKghfTpKEOxVg3zMoc02ZDTCvK9R5eA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=F93lSK0DJsU3DSdrnLvIaQA1DbTPa+T4lDX1h3aQ+xo=; b=DrJpXzp9SttOCfRSGHMqMatf7zn1FiGUOKL3cPuYOEB2uBqr3rs0qmxK2u5WtIlSeq+UD19Pjkr2wTwk3bgTpml/o6ovIc9SVNmFHZrZhqsqpGJOfU8ausNO8MldeCA5NwQ1NxbEJ+ys+DDwTykFmkf1X+csGLnSQCegy+cl7C8=
Received: from SN6PR11MB2800.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.93.15) by SN6PR11MB3488.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.112.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.20; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:29:39 +0000
Received: from SN6PR11MB2800.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59c7:c0f9:fd0c:861b]) by SN6PR11MB2800.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59c7:c0f9:fd0c:861b%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2451.027; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:29:39 +0000
From: "Felipe Garrido (fegarrid)" <fegarrid@cisco.com>
To: "ben@nostrum.com" <ben@nostrum.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud@ietf.org>, "tram-chairs@ietf.org" <tram-chairs@ietf.org>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVWSwHm6YEAP6+10e0gnTS8uaNiaeE9CAA
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:29:39 +0000
Message-ID: <F4F1CDF2-A1E0-4D82-913E-0E5178855783@cisco.com>
References: <153799041044.21545.15688918373860539781.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <77E6F21E-094B-42B4-8601-A7CEF28EAA79@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <77E6F21E-094B-42B4-8601-A7CEF28EAA79@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191013
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fegarrid@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.73]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 01f21c53-9ffd-4fd4-771b-08d768dcca93
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR11MB3488:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR11MB3488B217E8ADE4C14FED8A6CC8710@SN6PR11MB3488.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 02213C82F8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(189003)(199004)(86362001)(33656002)(66066001)(76116006)(7736002)(476003)(6436002)(3846002)(5640700003)(6512007)(486006)(54896002)(6306002)(236005)(14454004)(25786009)(64756008)(186003)(2351001)(66556008)(229853002)(606006)(66946007)(66476007)(6116002)(256004)(91956017)(11346002)(5660300002)(2501003)(6486002)(446003)(99286004)(58126008)(54906003)(9326002)(2616005)(6916009)(71190400001)(1730700003)(4326008)(316002)(66446008)(76176011)(8936002)(36756003)(6246003)(81166006)(2906002)(81156014)(102836004)(26005)(6506007)(478600001)(966005)(21615005)(8676002)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR11MB3488; H:SN6PR11MB2800.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: juLVA4l7+gyX4xDYWotfSHiQlxrEd7DW/j3ztEowFojwQvHw+KFa1xpz7NmtfJwM4VuB2V9MK/9V5GVijoIKO1JvTz8+xdGjRl31C/dbJvslEYNvavMOHAwhO3mBcyAYuvl8Vzhg/qUXEXTVtoqKDQIqNQcjGammwfPdIC+wUrkHd7v7UxlOynfwCTTcTk8bJiPETASfi0dZfVdW4RAWky7hCIrfAYsxXt6O6tKvuwhRv0hUF+NqnVLEM3rNI459fXNM+34f5FTmas9NjMoonacaZBDWzpavfWNY63xcC34DnzapO11wuuXBYJ3l7XtTkd+x8B6gJ5OuLERxbqs8JAG/kF4+oO7onXwekCnvtlZLDS+pqQidm6rsHONbk3GLiXAf3n/7uR2QVVWwDXEuYVe6+eQgiqUFIXr9YuxLFu9itAkU2x5aZFctNyFDTsdYlU3VpabfhnkuUCU3N+gB6XJNPjCfGEbty/M6VLJ845o=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F4F1CDF2A1E04D82913E0E5178855783ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 01f21c53-9ffd-4fd4-771b-08d768dcca93
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Nov 2019 08:29:39.5790 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 5muUB1gqTf32aeO5X8T2wePniI/9CnHfjzxyFvklLFGD2TdvEIC913XLBNt0l1BwDZufmND8OMesUNhZQSbc1g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR11MB3488
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.28, xch-rcd-018.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/Djid-EqegEd-T9jSKP7naIzUS08>
Subject: Re: [tram] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:29:46 -0000

Hi Ben,

Responses are in-line  and updated in the latest draft. Let me know if they address your COMMENTS.

Thanks,
-Felipe



From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com<mailto:ben@nostrum.com>>
Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10: (with COMMENT)
Date: September 26, 2018 at 3:33:30 PM EDT
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>
Cc: <draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud@ietf.org>>, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com<mailto:gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>>, Tolga Asveren <tasveren@rbbn.com<mailto:tasveren@rbbn.com>>, <tram-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:tram-chairs@ietf.org>>, <tasveren@rbbn.com<mailto:tasveren@rbbn.com>>, <tram@ietf.org<mailto:tram@ietf.org>>
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <marc@petit-huguenin.org<mailto:marc@petit-huguenin.org>>, <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>>

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Adam's DISCUSS. I will go a bit further to say that, even if a new
IETF LC occurs, I would be skeptical that the dependency on PADDING in a
standards track protocol is appropriate unless people are willing to argue that
RFC 5780 has become mature enough that it could reasonably be promoted to
standards track.

Another alternative might be to re-describe PADDING in this draft, as it is
used in the context of the draft. I don't normally love that sort of
duplication, but it might be appropriate here.

[FG] This was addressed in an earlier draft.


Other comments:

§2: "It is not intended as a replacement for [RFC4821]": I find this comment
confusing. Are other sections in the document intended to replace some or all
of 4821?
[FG] Updated wording.
“This section is meant to be informative only and is not intended as a substitute for…”

§4: "The probing mechanism is used to discover the Path MTU in one direction
only...": Can this mechanism not be used bidirectionally, with reciprocal
client-server roles?
[FG] Yes, and this is noted in later sections. Added additional wording in this section.
“Both endpoints MAY behave as a client and a server to achieve bi-directional path discovery.”

§4.1.2: "The server MUST add the FINGERPRINT attribute...": Is this a new
requirement for PMTUD, or a generic STUN requirement? If the latter, it should
not be stated normatively. (Same comment for §4.2.1)

[FG]  Yes, this is new for PMTUD.

§4.2.1: "If the authentication mechanism permits it, then the Indication MUST
be authenticated": Is that intended to imply it's okay to use authentication
mechanisms that don't allow this?

[FG] Yes, do you see an issue with the statement?