Re: [tram] IANA considerations in draft-ietf-tram-stunbis

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D4E12004F for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-Ut3hkSZTqd for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3AA31200C4 for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id 1so3793863iou.4 for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kPF5q7EWLjf5ERx9Z53puW9+iwMjvLGWNaSVJURw5xQ=; b=UrxXd5UqU7w2M5nj0as1XQIuvPmPriVn720rc5PXkGFVHg91GsZjq9nAwvm7i3Y+r5 PgBb7JmYgGpwqjeOIlwkahxTa9vKTBU9Oz7xutIP815AkEglhz1OjZvFFXdcxS4rTEJB iATCv+N4USpkUsf/XVosuviYaIhon02gNeKRLcZtbxX7JIYYQVJmQqfgM08pC0dnwukX IlniL9YPOjs/+e/XVdU+RwxhKES7IgeHxmwe+LPxJUb+bLePWOeKCXH2zSw4vr9czxRh 3oJfmM95gb9Q9WzW17TCL43jCAPMspmdvpWGzv2WBQG6QERpi6bvFaHUF9yUBEJYqOdY iEEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kPF5q7EWLjf5ERx9Z53puW9+iwMjvLGWNaSVJURw5xQ=; b=DHhl+Tol6JRcGwViZMhOgyZNzTDSQIfYCytC4yw9YLG5sFFDlYbsOTm19DeVzkA1YR 9yfF9fkgI0dncNW5ymVuO/ZESIRoczx68u3kWjniLpTVjETzQXH+vINutiupqHILnMrj I8ab2J3l0+Ofy/ayWAT8QI69supNYZn07ZqzcbP5bS0aB5s+OUpSEBN863gNL/wQpuLz X1Dsbf94S0OOzjBhy/Ge3jRJI2JbOHs5oKEyYBBjIXioNH5sDmOpKEHm4/xYtn8hSuOz yewAT4fk1M5k91ivBsCd/L0obEg6ib9s/Oyrxtmta3Kyuo8jxpe48A205ufRLijgoy0X zbfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUyrsi52g7xhhJHtgOfyRDtneFT3kzXnkZf6/R3W2wLPP8CE0ko mcun2InsbofiwK3N++gjS0+yEH6H175O2waa5HE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyA7vuzWRnO+WUFFP3VuQvWmllcTlkzERbVEVWDYl27cLB4qobf9I9x5LoKcuAnRx6QyxNgeKFAtKaD4391jWI=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9057:: with SMTP id v23mr5440379ioq.119.1572033645764; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0446c096-7efd-872e-5f9b-7ad42f249b6c@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <0446c096-7efd-872e-5f9b-7ad42f249b6c@alvestrand.no>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBmw2vC8okss37dVrd=x3rbfkN7JgUGH8QMRT01XreJDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: tram@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000007e3b70595c19ba7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/EubTskS0oY4lD_aPgG-XE08fDEc>
Subject: Re: [tram] IANA considerations in draft-ietf-tram-stunbis
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 20:00:49 -0000

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 4:32 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> This is defintely not what you want to hear when a document is in
> AUTH48....
>
> I wanted to write a request for a new STUN attribute today, and found
> that the registry pointed to the -stunbis draft for IANA instruction.
>
>
> On reading, I found that the instructions (such as they were; they
> weren't much) had been left behind in RFC 5389, which this draft was
> supposed to obsolete. Even the statement that the C000-FFFF range was
> "designatd expert" was missing.
>
>

> What should we do about this?
>
>
A short document that copies them out of RFC 5389 but doesn't change them?

Ted


>
> Harald
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>