IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] draft-ietf-tram-turnbis

Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com> Mon, 12 March 2018 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B387127599; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0K3bTqrSEz5; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD98126DED; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2CFvXDM024846; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:02:16 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=jan2016.eng; bh=GjY3HZNCxY18q4ZkpihNhG7kS8RTcnSv285UdA9j9tY=; b=aRhygvrU+TbAd6lwYtoUYNx6T0Hu92FisxeRRN0n0XoY8u9ugA6HpLl/5gswDClKxlri HMAdT6y7zHz8H4p25Bi8F9iyZF/GL3dNrA5CIdBflO6z2481+J8URA53zCCgHbeuaYCf mWpVcPxfqWF5q7m3xkNRhswHxZXOpnh7LQVe++hs+AiM8w11KjMfLFbiD3GHQtjMxpnu hIqTwG4tYhWLE/MTSTbWGAgY8lLecD2WZ3axHNnc/GKvwqgIVaYu2xqiPWVDwkscbPno z7X5hybbVoUqvn5XPsbMlRLVHnLX3MJHrlaJU+pn+BWPPft/a9lkm7vjvMLbYn8DroLF MQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gm53vwdsq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:02:15 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w2CG1Aif032126; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:02:15 -0400
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com ([172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2gmbjypdbp-1; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:02:15 -0400
Received: from [172.28.118.62] (bowill.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.28.118.62]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09165336E4; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:02:15 +0000 (GMT)
To: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>, Noriyuki Torii <torii0573@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-tram-turnbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tram-turnbis@ietf.org>
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
References: <CABEjbRKS04Wx-L3eKJBNFbsNywZe_19X2NY++3NSovr_3viJWg@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR16MB1425EF492922CE97B6CF256CEAD30@BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <ca9334ec-aa8c-55bd-3180-7086cd21952c@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:02:11 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR16MB1425EF492922CE97B6CF256CEAD30@BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-12_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803120183
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-12_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803120182
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/PP8ygYihP-LWhlThvvkf-h7loNw>
Subject: Re: [tram] draft-ietf-tram-turnbis
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:02:19 -0000

Hi Tiru,

I think that Torii's point is that according to stunbis section 9.2.5 a 
request that contains PASSWORD-ALGORITHM will also contain 
PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS, echoing back the value contained in the response. 
The example in section 18 does not show this.

--Brandon

On 03/12/2018 09:34 AM, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Noriyuki Torii
>> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 12:40 PM
>> To: draft-ietf-tram-turnbis@ietf.org
>> Cc: tram@ietf.org
>> Subject: [tram] draft-ietf-tram-turnbis
>>
>> To whom it may concern.
>>
>> I found some discrepancies in the draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-14.
>> Hope this may help for improvement.
>>
>> - Section 12 defines the allowed channel numbers as below,
>>
>>   >      0x4000 through 0x7FFF: These values are the allowed channel
>>   >      numbers (16,384 possible values).
>>
>>   but the RFC 7983 shrinks the valid range of channel number to 0x4000 -
>> 0x4FFF.
>>   Please see also
>>   https://www.iana.org/assignments/stun-parameters/stun-
>> parameters.xhtml#turn-channel
> 
> Thanks, fixed.
> 
>>
>> - STUNbis specification requires that PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS and
>> PASSWORD-
>>    ALGORITHM attributes are both present or neither not present in each
>>    request, from my understandings.
>>    If so, the section 18 needs refinements to reflect the above requirement,
>>    because some example requests shown in the current document only have
>>    PASSWORD-ALGORITHM and doesn't have PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS.
> 
> Section 18 discusses both PASSWORD-ALGORITHM and PASSWORD-ALGORITHMS (sent in Allocate error response).
> 
> -Tiru
> 
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Noriyuki Torii
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tram mailing list
>> tram@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email