Re: [tram] Milestone 5: TURN bis

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Fri, 07 February 2014 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4D51ACCD8 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:02:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FIFaXszBP9As for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2451C1ACCDF for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:02:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2173; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391792563; x=1393002163; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=fysJh0IewMZwpbEuzH8RsC9ZnZQ99HoFmYrTVWLs/yw=; b=IU+G0p7fSdxDMjHd4E5rCYg9HEgeMyswHbVlPLkEY8yyIzlep2aXhmjR ZkeeM6BqLgwW+z2gXTHGihgfiXEvq7fy70buzbxA+DNb5KP5c5/I76Sg+ n1uyVgz/n4acjUEzkO1FGeqCzCwf/taj8elzZQ4U1se1sp/XMWVgZgnUx k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAB0R9VKtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgww4V75ogQ4WdIIlAQEBAwEBAQEkRwsFCwIBCBguIQYLJQIEDgWHcQMJCA3DPQ2IaheMZoFkMweDJIEUBIkRjS6BbIEyiyyFQ4Mtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="18770574"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:02:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s17H2gJb030487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:02:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.213]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:02:42 -0600
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [tram] Milestone 5: TURN bis
Thread-Index: AQHPJBK+U59w4yBPMkKQnD5kNw6u2JqqYe8AgAAHU4A=
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:02:41 +0000
Message-ID: <3D258814-8958-4E01-83F9-5B31844A6602@cisco.com>
References: <52F4F0A4.9070104@viagenie.ca> <CAKhHsXEcbPf3FAmr8kJUBKg_Z+Hb92-non23G0GwgLONAq58wg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKhHsXEcbPf3FAmr8kJUBKg_Z+Hb92-non23G0GwgLONAq58wg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.102.154.240]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <22BBD4A0AB48814BB9ED94216DC69469@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] Milestone 5: TURN bis
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:02:45 -0000

+1

-G

On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:

> Simon,
> 
> I agree with this set of milestones and the prioritization.  I agree that the multi-tenant work should be done in the 2nd milestone on new authentication since we need these extensions now for deployment.   Milestones 4 and 5 should be the final work done in this group, which we should move forward with carefully on them to ensure that we haven't missed anything.
> 
> - Alan -
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> A new revision of RFC 5766 will contain:
> 
> - Various bug fixes
> - Support for multi-tenant servers
> 
> Above is an extract from the charter we have been working on in Github.
> But I think "Support for multi-tenant servers" is no longer appropriate
> for this milestone. First, it's really about STUN, not TURN, as recent
> discussions have shown. Second, this can be done as an extension, as the
> ORIGIN draft has shown. (This does not preclude adding the extension to
> a STUN bis document, though.) So this leaves bug fixes.
> 
> Anyway, IMHO, as for milestone 4, this is a lower-priority milestone.
> Completion of milestones 1,2,3 should be well in sight before we adopt a
> draft for this milestone. Nothing prevents individual people from
> starting work on this right now, but I would like the working group to
> delay adoption until higher-priority milestones are almost done.
> 
> This is also a longer-term effort. I suppose many draft revisions will
> be necessary. Therefore the target would be maybe one year away.
> 
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram