Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00
"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 21:24 UTC
Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000AA1A8A01 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1CZehprmjAO for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721031A8986 for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1430; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1411075450; x=1412285050; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=AmKpl9t0DdjcRWvODgOeTyd8b4pfp+452kIT6WeaieQ=; b=SEv5AGDB1TKTathkH7VYhcRVLdf/wpX130O9A05HUh6u2KpaCjgntS15 M/E2bhclLmQmwT8rqhbQZjtQbu1ucX1upONrmceQgUdEF8XcJyIHC02R0 8kTTlgtR2/78+Jwzf+uYz1hx6Atj5SVhhO9Y0rmUCCKRX34y2PrPsbntD E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAFhMG1StJA2H/2dsb2JhbABggw1TVwTJPQqHTQGBCxYBeYQDAQEBAwEBAQE3NAsQAgEIGB4QIQYLJQIEDgWIKgMJCA27EA2HLAETBI1KgXozB4MugR0FkU6JLoIQjwaGQoNebIFIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,549,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="79235639"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2014 21:24:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8ILO9d2016725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:24:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.78]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:24:09 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00
Thread-Index: AQHPzTZ9cDYu+ea/iEGE0aPHlSxTTZv7KhiAgAAJCgCAAAHqgIAL1EQpgAC92IA=
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:24:08 +0000
Message-ID: <F6B1AFDC-1E7A-4933-9D91-FD263D15337E@cisco.com>
References: <CANO7kWCiU275DnNsJ7pn8ALjpV5qVViCQUQS8VOgubArGYG_5g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXWLhAggZwP3ZhDsDMnx6ueYOjrMw12=tD9xEryx_5Z0A@mail.gmail.com> <C7219C6D-A887-4E05-8869-996F8B32D810@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV_u32ZLpoKxX7Z7ExbJAEOXgR9BgiZnRg7vEWFhaZ4rw@mail.gmail.com> <AEE73BD1-650C-41C5-A904-CD8E0E754EB3@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV5_anUGTcBFqfZOPSJ_GgT3XLsq2R1_1_dvUVb9yt8jQ@mail.gmail.com> <D03E1542.4DDBC%praspati@cisco.com> <CABkgnnXFtovkGegh5nieS5CWxUg6q8MQNm=V4od=J=BukkbPvA@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWDH0X3+ai0VxT0FaQUWA9jACrpAJPqLV+8wANcRuk9tLw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXcGRCb9r_f17YEEfVxuiWbySBe+CQnv-Dj9YgH_WdNEA@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWDeVFJq5i0iLxc7VqMS=OdMYPT-h3OcGt3k=Bzi+WuF3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANO7kWDeVFJq5i0iLxc7VqMS=OdMYPT-h3OcGt3k=Bzi+WuF3w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.102.154.255]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8841B5880E9BDB4CA9164B72D35F786B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/VMVlM57AYbS6UC75SAiZgqY8J08
Cc: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:24:12 -0000
On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > How else would normal Binding requests be identified? I mean, I don't have a use case, but as an implementer I need to know what ALPN label to use. > > I can't imagine wrapping a Binding request in a (D)TLS handshake in any scenario. It is usually the other easy around. > > > Agreed. But can we agree that if someone did want to do it, one could rightfully expect it to work? > > And, in those cases where you are sending Binding requests, your goal isn't to do STUN. That isn't the application protocol, it's something like RTP, or that thing your game talks, or some new STUN usage that really does something. > > > Correct. So if I'm developing a game, and I'm using STUN to punch holes in the NAT for my game protocol to go through, what do I use as ALPN label? "stun.X-my-awesome-game"? I'm a developer, not a protocol designer, so just tell me please. > > I think we should tell those developers to use "stun". I agree. Martin - Do you see the need for any further text edits based on the -04? Thanks, Gonzalo > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > tram mailing list > tram@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
- [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00 Prashanth Patil (praspati)