Re: [tram] FW: New Version Notification for draft-patil-tram-turn-serv-disc-00.txt

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 11 February 2014 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D7A1A067E for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUKDCG7za_6t for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7641A066C for <tram@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:3e97:eff:fe0b:dd8a]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B2CD4690E; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:13:25 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <52FA6845.90002@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:13:25 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
References: <20140211051944.2479.50189.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A242ABB49@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <52FA3100.60906@viagenie.ca> <CF205D5C.1C418%praspati@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF205D5C.1C418%praspati@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [tram] FW: New Version Notification for draft-patil-tram-turn-serv-disc-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:13:29 -0000

Le 2014-02-11 12:40, Prashanth Patil (praspati) a écrit :
>> 3. It would be nice to make anycast work with TCP.
> 
> Yep. However, do we really need it in the context of discovery? If a
> client can discover a server using UDP, the client can choose to
> subsequently contact the same server over TCP.

Right, that would be one possible method. One drawback would be that it
would confuse the _tcp and _udp SRV stuff, and servers would be forced
to provide TCP and UDP service on the same address(es).

Another possibility would be to just go ahead and do discovery over TCP.
I don't think routing stability would be an issue for such a short-term
session.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca