Re: [tram] Milestone 5: TURN bis

Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Fri, 07 February 2014 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A701B1AC4A3 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:36:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Fasklls0BKW for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E3D1A1F7B for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p10so3351832pdj.15 for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:36:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Alhdt/ej/WBhfI6BdvvWbLJY+etbpdMmU1+5IrnS3Wk=; b=rKAYmpita0cNF4F9lWbigvKQu09gsKSc0tDlWEYV+QdhyzfK9jUjkeE/19iqrhuh5M XyJmn9zqjod2k3bZz+lrYf3PBXRVSHz8PM9IMw8wSO2drNr5AZomxQ03Ur60s9W8J078 aoWlSQ9/IdYQsV6lLBqzPUSyEdzrwideMwDloeFjyUswh34sBkPawBkyBFCnLEmvvcFg CBHYZyMR47DhlSLblQQjHZGJ40ajFA5KoLSCTKoVeK1/xFcrIuDj0fEmFaPlHX6mHUm+ WFKb3Z6EC1CFi9K6WcI/Uy3VoMYJ1xQDpBAexHMwiuo5pmhSk+Swe/kI4o+wEDuDUK7F 8RLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.67.13.226 with SMTP id fb2mr8823428pad.146.1391790988945; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.168.132 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:36:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52F4F0A4.9070104@viagenie.ca>
References: <52F4F0A4.9070104@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 10:36:28 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKhHsXEcbPf3FAmr8kJUBKg_Z+Hb92-non23G0GwgLONAq58wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b07239a7f6ee504f1d39763"
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] Milestone 5: TURN bis
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:36:30 -0000

Simon,

I agree with this set of milestones and the prioritization.  I agree that
the multi-tenant work should be done in the 2nd milestone on new
authentication since we need these extensions now for deployment.
Milestones 4 and 5 should be the final work done in this group, which we
should move forward with carefully on them to ensure that we haven't missed
anything.

- Alan -


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
> wrote:

> A new revision of RFC 5766 will contain:
>
> - Various bug fixes
> - Support for multi-tenant servers
>
> Above is an extract from the charter we have been working on in Github.
> But I think "Support for multi-tenant servers" is no longer appropriate
> for this milestone. First, it's really about STUN, not TURN, as recent
> discussions have shown. Second, this can be done as an extension, as the
> ORIGIN draft has shown. (This does not preclude adding the extension to
> a STUN bis document, though.) So this leaves bug fixes.
>
> Anyway, IMHO, as for milestone 4, this is a lower-priority milestone.
> Completion of milestones 1,2,3 should be well in sight before we adopt a
> draft for this milestone. Nothing prevents individual people from
> starting work on this right now, but I would like the working group to
> delay adoption until higher-priority milestones are almost done.
>
> This is also a longer-term effort. I suppose many draft revisions will
> be necessary. Therefore the target would be maybe one year away.
>
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>