IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Recent updates to draft 21 of 6962-bis

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 05 December 2016 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C208E1294D0 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 05:56:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JIAEZfVagHxU for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 05:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E5F129489 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 05:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tXRBD4TndzpD; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:56:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1480946180; bh=MahC+q0izlgzSio1Vk2ksAyqEBTd7MVy37ujGCszWMQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Sp44GIPfZhw38ZaMgih81TXoZT45PYAmLzkh72eifehOB9wG7Ex8wJvKCnD6yqYln LTsMY82FBUOU57C4aupCCzeJUJFWikCdu4rxEK0ngLjkOxMwMPJt8CyaLD/L9P/2GY N0VdNn9HqrciJ8O+iDwKihsAimc9Wb883vyJAoVk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQnzGwRoQRBs; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:56:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:56:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E57C9506F8E; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 08:56:17 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca E57C9506F8E
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD91040D7281; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 08:56:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 08:56:17 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALzYgEfq=1x6TEMpwP5cS-SeS6HHLw=btwnnp+myGNaTLpJgdg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612050855470.2956@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CALzYgEfq=1x6TEMpwP5cS-SeS6HHLw=btwnnp+myGNaTLpJgdg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/-I-BEOljYvY5rXCamQ0qJYnTVmI>
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Recent updates to draft 21 of 6962-bis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:56:28 -0000

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Eran Messeri wrote:

> A few changes were made to draft 21 of 6962-bis to address Paul Wouters' comments as he was doing the shepherds write-up:* A few references
> to obsolete RFCs were replaced with the newer versions.
> * RFC6962-bis is explicitly deprecating RFC6962.
> * Title has been changed to reflect this is Certificate Transparency V2.
> * An outline of the differences from RFC6962 has been added to the introduction.
> * The IANA section was incomplete - particularly, missing repositories' names, which were added.

Thanks for making the changes!

> Note: The act of committing text changes to the GitHub repo does not make them final - this is just the authors' workflow. Any issue with
> the draft should be filed on the trans issue tracker, we'll address it and the chairs will close if we have addressed the workgroup's
> concerns properly.

Or you can of course discuss it on the trans list itself.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email