Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> Wed, 26 February 2014 12:45 UTC
Return-Path: <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C3F1A02F8 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:45:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRbn8bcdYTwz for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:45:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com (mail-qc0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CABC1A02E3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:45:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r5so1170952qcx.38 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:45:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y5rR/URGitC72AegSPXlFfHqfA3oSguAHN6nyqdFURM=; b=NIQlCc8tR3qkLnGfQOShg6G/uzXH/ArYFmTeSKJuQayCilKLkJxavKJZ2FNk6Q0qiP IK06aqE54wG9TiN8h+O3w2DWSkJjB1Z/dGmKhE6oZ6ekOwYfGhDdaDEn0BTl9Drvu7CB l8cdJQHbKYYJYd50pFpOo8zIATdbXc7fCKNpo3LG2kfymGGE0JunRwe+3x2ak0snUG3j xbn2TC7xJMde5rxPhTF4eQbG2YNkp5vX1x+rHWTAkVJzgM92HFoItsrmRkZYa7BFYDaF KvSvoFBTXVMURl7yIYeBA1fFefbEfd7XKC68rMswe5whl9BQH87OULQ+aUgHtH5Do/uW O/oQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmkmNUpVwFCLZ84noqFBTzMLhgQCqZ0EPg+IMdDv6pp6lxtSXt1EAOdxdlbMj4HjCDzLO8
X-Received: by 10.224.98.212 with SMTP id r20mr7778567qan.0.1393418749073; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.4] (pool-173-79-106-67.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.79.106.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm2171162qax.11.2014.02.26.04.45.47 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:45:48 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:45:31 -0500
From: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
To: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Message-ID: <CF334A3B.11C9F%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
Thread-Topic: [Trans] Draft agenda
References: <53063600.4020102@gmail.com> <CALzYgEe0XrQdKDZN3_dwFLnM87+TXyYRMzj4ZGe5xKi-T_5V+g@mail.gmail.com> <530B86F6.5040201@gmail.com> <CABrd9SSpyw4nJ9t7X0WDeN+1MnhD+__-QXLOQXYs=h2JCUrwDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwj4XniVS_n+M3TmT_LM+P6H6HGgcnhMezUjnupKXzwwdg@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9STabJA4Fp75HfC7ORR1LQZT+q0DDuB61O0JGBOt31cpmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgT8MEG+Svr3zmMYYPrQNEXwtNPL0m7CjYFHKUAKKbfFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9STQQ69cPo3F5c22__aGbPAKV3AXnTFB47yd3s7+SQOpww@mail.gmail.com> <530DD6BC.8080207@comodo.com> <CABrd9SSX9XFqQK+UBdvai-ACLkPT6mudXsjYmh-cGOp-P62vog@mail.gmail.com> <530DDF7D.4040206@comodo.com>
In-Reply-To: <530DDF7D.4040206@comodo.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/0KeDHW-RW9Ie2hPFePnhX9Rd35Y
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:45:52 -0000
On 2/26/14, 7:35 AM, "Rob Stradling" <rob.stradling@comodo.com> wrote: >On 26/02/14 12:27, Ben Laurie wrote: >> On 26 February 2014 11:57, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> >>wrote: ><snip> >>> But if we must have ritual compliance with 5280, then my preferred >>>solution >>> is to "poison" the Issuer Name in the Precertificate. >>> >>> For example... >>> Certificate Issuer Name: C=GB, O=My CA Ltd., CN=My CA >>> Precertificate Issuer Name: 1.2.3.4=CT, C=GB, O=My CA Ltd., CN=My CA >>> >>> Sign both the Precertificate and the Certificate with the same CA >>>private >>> key. Use the same serial number for both. >>> >>> It wouldn't matter whether or not there exists a CA Certificate with >>>the >>> Subject Name "1.2.3.4=CT, C=GB, O=My CA Ltd., CN=My CA". >> >> Ah. I like that idea. Rather less than I like the idea of fixing the >> need for ritual compliance, though. > >+1 While I agree that lack of a CA certificate with the matching naming really doesn¹t matter, breaking name chaining seems like an odd way to maintain ³ritual compliance". Why not bump the version number instead? v4 could be defined as a pre-certificate containing a poison extension and a serial number that matches its v3 counterpart.
- [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Eran Messeri
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Eran Messeri
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Trevor Freeman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Trevor Freeman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- [Trans] running code (was: Re: Draft agenda) Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Carl Wallace
- Re: [Trans] running code (was: Re: Draft agenda) Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] running code Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Trans] running code Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Carl Wallace
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Tomas Gustavsson
- Re: [Trans] running code Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] running code (was: Re: Draft agenda) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] running code Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Trevor Freeman