Re: [Trans] DNSSEC also needs CT

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 13 May 2014 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67A01A00D7 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.044
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p7v2yiXMdcIp for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148111A00DE for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC79B2007F21E for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=6K1uOZMY8a/FvLkLiquK 4i0NYAY=; b=OWvwJx4F4TEieQZGsrRsSPrv0aKaIfMFSKRQ+2dOeH4R2r3C3Z8k v6oCPX3bAXirame9H4osL7HlD6afcjmXw/m52kdSCXI69Jw2psWRuAdQIJutSq4r uyzTPSCWymwOKWL0Qkn/kTJ/oCQjwXoD++0Tpijyucs6TXZpqdkJPyI=
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1CEC2007F228 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b13so516148wgh.19 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.92.228 with SMTP id cp4mr1875314wjb.81.1399993083575; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.29.200 with HTTP; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOjj-O-Oy6u_83hAAfjgdmBiCg6zmLo_T8j3Z0J0ymTJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK3OfOjiL2DTJPH3CaAjg8YGrrwN56SgQ+DnqPXx4MLbgXQN+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiKjY6YyiyeHiFJrecZfj_uQ-2k+KucKnzb9Yt8VCRPOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKpN7AXfrH6SzroMukrKTPR5z24U9KfWpVW-F2R_wX3ag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1405101722240.897@bofh.nohats.ca> <CABrd9ST7K-7RGwGD2G+kDcVSceC2ZJ-5Tz2tdp5NWa3cqBK+-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Ui=nqmCfjBYNE2CJtEs1jnbavpY4Dv-T3FRDdAwAA2dScg@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiYMJkXVR+QsCzEV0ir6u53coJz0b-JdGGD5bTTz5YcMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Ui=u0fkm9_nuXx_6gpH6jHM5pBvzjzru9O8y3bpLkA0qmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOi6y=QAMXe_2axiavxwR5nS2Uv8SM4JxQHsvEKbUyNGCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Uimvc6e6u=fJjM1-iaOTepA33Sx5CBjMV9dB8sSLqtZoWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhdhWdGvvhuaGyE_p5kLy0ZX-V5sAXfoLGP_8d8vPJDgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Uik+fjM4wTVBiFxphVZAwVYBPgd1a9xUyUBMSFy30SWNLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiC+5+s2UtSEP788W23tHq6VQSQfMsUboUp16L-27zsvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9STYxmK6gg7a5wDtejdc_Y0aD9hwQkHpFu3HbxVbMZDQHQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1405130948160.25023@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAK3OfOjj-O-Oy6u_83hAAfjgdmBiCg6zmLo_T8j3Z0J0ymTJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:58:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOhxDqpEpLOQegtLXLeHRtdsuC9=4dcQhxeaxTKMOYpH0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/0wvovTX6oVuyzwE9wazAtwJy3ig
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] DNSSEC also needs CT
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 14:58:12 -0000

To what degree are the privacy issues different for DNSSEC than for PKI?

I would think: they aren't!  Both are PKIs, both have public data,
users (in the sense of having certificates) tend to want to avoid
enumeration below certain points in the hierarchy.

Nico
--