Re: [Trans] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: (with COMMENT)

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

On 29/07/2021 23:06, Salz, Rich wrote:

>   * So returning to my previous point, it seems rather heavyweight to
>     update the IANA registry every time this happens, and it would
>     arguably be efficient to assign a given operator a range so that
>     these need not be deconflicted in perpetuity?
>
> The registry is only for those organization that don’t have an OID arc 
> of their own. Getting one is pretty easy, one possibility is 
> requesting it at https://pen.iana.org/pen/PenApplication.page 
> <https://pen.iana.org/pen/PenApplication.page>
>
Which is First Come First Served registry, which is a rather low bar.
>
> We could add that to the doc if you think it would be useful.  You get 
> what’s called an “arc” and then you append .1, .2, .3.1, etc., as you 
> want.
>
Indeed. Org arc only need to be allocated once and can be used for all 
sort of other protocols as well.