Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)

Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> Fri, 19 May 2017 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@briansmith.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB7812945A for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=briansmith-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qLnwKXfb552m for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A59124BFA for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e65so53068895ita.1 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=briansmith-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nRMETg/U7TmHGh+7YrNQtEeJJp0Rm2Qookx4e+K1Crw=; b=h4KGWCQu89JLlyOl22qFVrGapZ9ihqRkUWVQATtnURDPSuC8ejVA0ZYoylVo4bEFv/ aqmRS12QSpgYyz5ir2v4BRgZ/p1XQazD1BmvvyWFkCPnGPMQzhv1MY6kHi9LVbOhj33S 8bgK5HnDvmAUiXHMhLI7r60G8ib3L3Px/6/x/zcKyQomgnUfg0rJF01q+s5gYijjc+0s 0MrzciTbPGSqWzRxm76GCqRzBeRTlWxWUIszvvwnWMCZUi1liyb87t1jUKbV2ejApUfw ERIe4fW4LtquGZAOzqm3IrPfvBPfSElz7teqZToACses923Z3sZsFYPT/tUNBEXLVq0f 6idg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nRMETg/U7TmHGh+7YrNQtEeJJp0Rm2Qookx4e+K1Crw=; b=DIJzHEjDBzLRESfZsH11jAye6mnVurNZBIxX+2uVYOjpVLNPXgNzEWkTeNIki6AXDW 0obY/ri5TTXSvvIL36mA2i4Jx7gv01d94eI6cwjcwXL6N3ReEL+EncnMK7Ip+etZQ9PK eO5H+fmGiSDn7qgEFlLnrU4idrNpbC8qido969jrgx5Hf78vF9AACsNKFSiTm6e1f+XW FmPvXZ9YWL1UK1ywB4NxN/aDZ6Y2V75HvaIoiApYQpVd/u11s70tpCUKQgil/nQLQEFc kQ62+NnrRVuzZsMxsVIxKg8YUwVs64EhPeW7QQqv0T4spZLhekE9mnEpFkNxKOI7JvWW Kr4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBCYcEJFH+TRZJGrEHtkETjLP07u5I5iFq7E3sPxufwjSZvepsN v7oNg0xoVrNCDXBZsLqld+lA8qGBgUIu
X-Received: by 10.36.77.211 with SMTP id l202mr12824116itb.74.1495225398804; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.47.146 with HTTP; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACM=_OdZy2wyNZo4GMtOSdmanzBhyw=SKr=DOOSS9h05V80arw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALzYgEe+PbYJN6Zz4NnPXBnnhYCi8Op-WmSzFKGxRv+uf+b=sA@mail.gmail.com> <20170504082636.dd0212e34e17949eb69b2fed@andrewayer.name> <CAFDDyk93AcRsCTmt+EPO6VFn-Y4D8g1ETTdGuJrtVk3rH7Xnxg@mail.gmail.com> <20170504123447.41d957a88bd65417e714be78@andrewayer.name> <CAFDDyk-DyBObm2W96R1dZPET-CWwTnitmonkHV2oT+_GH4Gyew@mail.gmail.com> <20170505100910.f3da472d9ad71d1d540b8b62@andrewayer.name> <87lgq7j6a3.fsf@nordberg.se> <CALzYgEeXq0iwJTOfcRUQPR49=Xaqvd21nR=Tk5C884xyGehRuQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170516221717.c05a62d681ecd64322bdc682@andrewayer.name> <CALzYgEdgDSOTTL3BdBFCZCLmH6Z=c==m53d3KO-oKu2RFt4cqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACM=_OdZy2wyNZo4GMtOSdmanzBhyw=SKr=DOOSS9h05V80arw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 10:23:18 -1000
Message-ID: <CAFewVt7TBwAJ8BxFJ1ju3EzcWWScA7CwBTvipaZEpUdRCFA0dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Al Cutter <al@google.com>
Cc: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>, Linus Nordberg <linus@sunet.se>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/3_HgMV-WeFuYqD9oYswo2wc2F1Q>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 20:23:21 -0000

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Al Cutter <al@google.com> wrote:
> I admit I'm not really that familiar with process of defining RFCs, but it
> seems weird to me to add a mandatory API, which, as defined in the standard
> which makes it mandatory, doesn't solve the problem it was added to solve...

I agree with this. This is an extra hoop for logs to jump through that
doesn't add significant value.

There are lots of ways to improve CT beyond this RFC. Things like
this, if they should be standardized at all, should go into their own
RFCs that update or even obsolete 6962-bis. Perhaps a 6962-bis-bis.

Cheers,
Brian
--
https://briansmith.org/