Re: [Trans] Milestones
Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 21:35 UTC
Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD95C1A01E5 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:35:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.41
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R06uDUulbC3r for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (eth5.brad-fw.brad.office.ccanet.co.uk [178.255.87.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B8D1A0193 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 10659 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Feb 2014 21:35:18 -0000
Received: from nigel.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:35:18 +0000
Message-ID: <530BBB15.5000600@comodo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:35:17 +0000
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trans@ietf.org, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
References: <530637C7.303@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <530637C7.303@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/3yjIOttkSZ0LEnY7H-exbkc6JOs
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Milestones
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:35:23 -0000
On 20/02/14 17:13, Melinda Shore wrote: > One of the first things we need to do is to establish milestones > for working group deliverables, specifically a target date for > getting 6962bis through working group last call. It's my > sense right now that things are going pretty smoothly and there > are no major points of contention. If we shoot for November > 2014 for wglc we'd be able to discuss problems that come up > during last call at the November meeting. So: > > Does November 2014 seem reasonable for working group last > call for 6962bis? Ben, does November 2014 work for you, given the milestones dated earlier than that in Google's EV/CT roll-out plan? -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online
- [Trans] Milestones Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Milestones Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Milestones Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Milestones Melinda Shore