Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962
Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com> Tue, 11 March 2014 00:14 UTC
Return-Path: <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3A41A069C for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ACD5luoDBzY for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AD51A06A3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [173.75.83.129] (helo=Williams-MacBook-Pro.local) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <frantz@pwpconsult.com>) id 1WNAL3-000267-S0; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 20:14:34 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:14:28 -0700
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiYZi=+dPFecO7GHQc5=-d=tWenkQ-igMJtfpq0PenN9w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <r422Ps-1075i-0BB240A7A2644D5AA820331F73FD3375@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.3.1 (422)
X-ELNK-Trace: 3a5e54fa03f1b3e21aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec794e10cf6a4fb9ae5c62f614387a59fe0b350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 173.75.83.129
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/4qVirJyaoSK1qs3upA7eJylFlX4
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:14:42 -0000
On 3/10/14 at 12:25 PM, hallam@gmail.com (Phillip Hallam-Baker) wrote: >There is an open question on how to manage JSON extensibility. There's no problem here. JSON will not be extended. Doug Crockford, the inventor of JSON is adamant that there is only one version. Forever. Now someone may make a new serialization format that shares many features with JSON, but it won't be JSON. Cheers - Bill ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Concurrency is hard. 12 out | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, CA 95032
- [Trans] Comments on RFC6962 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Trans] Fwd: Comments on RFC6962 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962 Bill Frantz
- Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962 Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962 Bill Frantz
- Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962 Jon Callas