IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 02 October 2019 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B692912002F for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LR-e_DwukvFj for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231DD120018 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46k7C70jVszJsK; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:33:55 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1570048435; bh=dS098yfwH1pQr4LH3ejgS/MpwCWh4NG/XHUjqGKRCMo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=TFbbT7rxBBORSpz1ZW/5LjnyJucFbcijhgafWKiGKc9PfuBFlC9X+XpBpzuvKXauQ ScSwdFz692wfCFLvh+HIacqWsV4ag4GFeu+zb3xlxx2cAL6DXVH1+GGVajQjj76neg uNXaHxmElkBulncUHIBVqpJoqDMMM+dFlsO4TUtM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4YDFu6nJRzSS; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:33:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:33:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.199.47.64] (199-7-157-65.eng.wind.ca [199.7.157.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B61EBB378B; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:33:50 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca B61EBB378B
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-B8479737-B3C9-4C5E-A05F-35C5D18563BA
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR17MB3162421FA5F9B3E45C9701D6AA9C0@DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:33:48 -0400
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>, Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <865F1869-312D-417F-8423-C408ACB07098@nohats.ca>
References: <SY2PR01MB276490D6C4040637426A787CE5880@SY2PR01MB2764.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <627fc1e2-b31a-f735-d85b-f16966a744ca@sectigo.com> <20190924141520.376fbedc7f469fe9971568f7@andrewayer.name> <DM6PR17MB3162421FA5F9B3E45C9701D6AA9C0@DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
To: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/8gpOREpNw1kdkgHBHp9xROKSya0>
Subject: Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 20:34:00 -0000

Go ahead Rob,

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 14:49, Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com> wrote:
> 
> Paul, Melinda,
> 
> May I go ahead and merge https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313?
> 
> James (via a private message) and Andrew have both given it the thumbs up, but it's still not clear to me what the 6962-bis authors can or can't do at this point in the editing cycle.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> From: Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
> Sent: 24 September 2019 19:15
> To: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>
> Cc: Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>om>; trans@ietf.org <trans@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>
>  
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:20:46 +0000
> Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com> wrote:
> 
> > [Chairs: Given the stage we're at with this document, please could I
> > ask you to confirm whether or not we may adopt James's editorial
> > suggestions?]
> > 
> > On 20/09/2019 03:17, Manger, James wrote:
> > > Editorial suggestions for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis.
> > 
> > James: Thanks!  I think your editorial suggestions add clarity.
> > 
> > Here's a PR:
> > https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313
> 
> This is a good change.  With RFC6962, some implementations include
> "https://" when addressing logs and others don't.  This change
> makes clear that "https://" should be included.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> Trans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email