Re: [Trans] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

SGTM.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:32 PM Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> On 29/07/2021 23:06, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>
>
>    - So returning to my previous point, it seems rather heavyweight to
>    update the IANA registry every time this happens, and it would arguably be
>    efficient to assign a given operator a range so that these need not be
>    deconflicted in perpetuity?
>
>
>
> The registry is only for those organization that don’t have an OID arc of
> their own.  Getting one is pretty easy, one possibility is requesting it at
> https://pen.iana.org/pen/PenApplication.page
>
> Which is First Come First Served registry, which is a rather low bar.
>
> We could add that to the doc if you think it would be useful.  You get
> what’s called an “arc” and then you append .1, .2, .3.1, etc., as you want.
>
> Indeed. Org arc only need to be allocated once and can be used for all
> sort of other protocols as well.
>
>