[Trans] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 01 July 2021 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietf.org
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03CF3A05AC; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 06:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org, trans-chairs@ietf.org, trans@ietf.org, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, paul.wouters@aiven.io, paul.wouters@aiven.io
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.33.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <162514523363.7451.4061223163880897031@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 06:13:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/9o__2Nw2iFOh7LSabMJDGTmn3_g>
Subject: [Trans] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 13:14:01 -0000

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the efforts of this document.

I think it will be good to add section describing what is expected out of this
experimental document. Shepherd's write up describes the intention of
publishing this as Standard Track then WG decision to move it back to
Experimental. I think it is worth capturing the thoughts and reasoning there
and also set some expectations on this document for potential future reversions.