Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CT

Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com> Wed, 01 April 2015 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kseo@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01D31A7011 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X10Em9nN9yUr for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666B41A0060 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-089-172.bbn.com ([128.89.89.172]:55704) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kseo@bbn.com>) id 1YdPXy-0005XQ-68 for trans@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:47:34 -0400
Message-ID: <551C5968.4090903@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:47:36 -0400
From: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <551067E8.1010201@gmail.com> <551C2C7E.2090900@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <551C2C7E.2090900@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/A5E-Iv-BwIp3jD98OVHa4QyV0B8>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CT
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:47:37 -0000

Sorry for redundant vote -- looked for my earlier vote and somehow 
missed it.

On 4/1/15 1:35 PM, Karen Seo wrote:
> +1 to adopt
>
> On 3/23/15 3:22 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
>> Hi, all:
>>
>> This is a call for adoption of a working group deliverable
>> providing a threat analysis for CT, based on the summary
>> provided by 
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-trans-0.pdf
>> and on previous discussion on this mailing list.
>>
>> This call closes on Friday, April 10.  Please review the
>> slides and provide an indication of whether or not you
>> support draft adoption.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Melinda & Paul
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trans mailing list
>> Trans@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> Trans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans