Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings.
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 22:50 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA701A0758 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hWtz7I36gfAx for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6F11A074C for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id mc6so1171600lab.41 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b5ib/21jfr4zdTXza6LJzmfRfwCQDWSLF1uIexzP324=; b=X9AeUvDm7vKT03VT15IG9ExhCxK6DZDnQah2XE/Fe90FYWRZhh38fADDm+wVJPx0f+ GAuO5WimkWAAXpKrqfMVJQq/Iu2CJ20qh9tua+hT2V2ljL2TjHQCP06hYrQNR92OfqxH SlAQ2bnJlr08sCtvOQfDkyQT+5bOODaHWMUqTT1K0v7ijftaO0GpGPKB/E4yZecTIG+b xHNwccYd+MHVgoeEfmxp07dzzL7ci782Sy6JtOgolq2FgwgLHGbhwsLBpitV6rFw1FP/ nQnWcYFuuzmWnNmzQf3lECXH375KFLiKHqW3PlD+L3AL1KiXbyEuiZPa0c7VfHILB9zN iygw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.210.70 with SMTP id ms6mr2863300lac.5.1394751007182; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5322131A.2080507@comodo.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwjy7gMphsfByROYP2WDTvP4nVkCQPj=oHkVFr=AQv=qjw@mail.gmail.com> <5322131A.2080507@comodo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:50:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwhz7KM44kMgn8mdFtR6Ow=aMik-5GD-Wge+JZUKz751mA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11380ac45553e704f484c620"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/BjJAg9JNeggGA9MNGeL55qCiMHE
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings.
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:50:16 -0000
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>wrote: > (Inspired by RFC5280 Appendix C) > > Would it help to include one or more example SCTs in the text? I think we definitely need that for Proposed. But right now I am trying to see how complete the description is. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
- [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Eran Messeri
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Rick Andrews
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. David A. Cooper
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Rick Andrews
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Rick Andrews
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Salz, Rich
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Erwann Abalea
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Bill Frantz
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Erwann Abalea
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Bill Frantz
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Salz, Rich
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Bill Frantz
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Gervase Markham
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Gervase Markham
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] RFC6962 BIS Log file encodings. Eran Messeri