[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 01 May 2014 13:56 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8D71A08CB; Thu, 1 May 2014 06:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPKZxQZuhQfE; Thu, 1 May 2014 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721541A08CD; Thu, 1 May 2014 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140501135613.11925.92356.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 06:56:13 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/Bo1kZISD6DdAIdPIqmL5vcQ9atQ
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 13:56:14 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Public Notary Transparency Working Group of the IETF. Title : Certificate Transparency Authors : Ben Laurie Adam Langley Emilia Kasper Rob Stradling Filename : draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-03.txt Pages : 30 Date : 2014-05-01 Abstract: This document describes an experimental protocol for publicly logging the existence of Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificates as they are issued or observed, in a manner that allows anyone to audit certificate authority (CA) activity and notice the issuance of suspect certificates as well as to audit the certificate logs themselves. The intent is that eventually clients would refuse to honor certificates that do not appear in a log, effectively forcing CAs to add all issued certificates to the logs. Logs are network services that implement the protocol operations for submissions and queries that are defined in this document. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-… internet-drafts