Re: [Trans] Milestones

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 26 February 2014 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD0F1A065C for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:39:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WOTts854VR1z for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A057E1A0454 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id id10so1114058vcb.27 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:39:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rXy45kAFRkJ/r2/QxxHzzVW4HBKJGK7WDv2XicMSbQM=; b=Jx8nlxwh87EpXjcD+uBFjFk+QdJdZoYGByjDuWM37vKrjrVt6AhJbKQRsYcCOfUXC4 qNpSbUZn4/9LWWWTR/oIhkgypSM439pICb+HuFB2Eh50b3H58NsFV4UmF8RjARHiFjPU Y6MpozdolpMzvYH2gxn4P7uzKcT2dyPY3eZ7N95/Q6Wx0vgULBRZgXdkbz7yTepsHmZX CA0EgFspcNC6D4A1HDRMZPXmP36zLsnGRtldNPYINRFL/e+raoJcNdGH7vcrTr+Ty4UL W2MmoNjuT8gW12KQpPa+B9LaiQj2BCUDzOsd0lnUENgSlLI6Nh27IhrXUynCuE3iRSKa rlcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rXy45kAFRkJ/r2/QxxHzzVW4HBKJGK7WDv2XicMSbQM=; b=BFYtkmChFAfeUdUkwACvJ3LSnfNQKMgp/hIq/SRHk/okuQkeO81R28TluxcI60HCcy JG9mrJ4LVfehO3dTxE6BHbJiQf3RM+Lsy/OLhUrXNoWWglRSuBd7tmwHX3WtZ2gnAlPj myeKStV3Vg+JnDGLDAlXx9wKcarSgaeCj7jKoGM5UKrhLrc5dk2EB4Tz1MS7QwayqNFe 3gXLw2sNSjIYSdKpt21UWtd9b3cRH3RaDRqmuDJ2s+fKc7N7l5qG1rNZUxI8thithFNW Fd3fI7Zbs98qyESuJPlYtNO2yg3MFyyHI5L3TWFIE7H3c19KKAJcfu6bYfjPgAKCPeZx ZspQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmFAoa/sxLaVnHD9KY3hCr48MPEZxOXQPj5fu7kbf5xMIl8pHf6+/Lwv2lZKbba3I4o9CMywwahFD3i+lXtNcdaMg8s8sg43L0AYOH00rGBpsrjj+HwwAoTc8HFQfcuPMYYJ5tAS7zkmdRfqQ92sJ/s27MpSKLQxxhIxheQzdTzAdSHj+zNU5qBPenOdLyGpQBnlBwE
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.67.18 with SMTP id p18mr6497325vci.14.1393429150073; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.230.105 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:39:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <530BBB15.5000600@comodo.com>
References: <530637C7.303@gmail.com> <530BBB15.5000600@comodo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:39:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SRu1JJQx2px=mmQunCidyLvFOfdJmiiUxVUGG9zxXyv7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/C7IuNpeBDWNQ4cMHBvnFf8tJ4Io
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Milestones
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:39:15 -0000

On 24 February 2014 21:35, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> wrote:
> On 20/02/14 17:13, Melinda Shore wrote:
>>
>> One of the first things we need to do is to establish milestones
>> for working group deliverables, specifically a target date for
>> getting 6962bis through working group last call.  It's my
>> sense right now that things are going pretty smoothly and there
>> are no major points of contention.  If we shoot for November
>> 2014 for wglc we'd be able to discuss problems that come up
>> during last call at the November meeting.  So:
>>
>> Does November 2014 seem reasonable for working group last
>> call for 6962bis?
>
>
> Ben, does November 2014 work for you, given the milestones dated earlier
> than that in Google's EV/CT roll-out plan?

I don't think we can realistically have a milestone soon enough to be
compatible with those. Besides, experience with that rollout should
probably inform 6962bis (yeah, I know, running code! Its almost like
the 90s!)