[Trans] Milestones

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C871A0225 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:13:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1Ib-OPmdgpw for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com (mail-pb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497011A0221 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id um1so2158900pbc.5 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:13:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0N1tv5Sx1c1uHwh8vGLRuRqePRKlsuJaoMEqTrksLsQ=; b=aXlxCVgLVLpMG/EKkuzeto1y/XWYJwCXTowU745PIgf0lXf+3lFvwe7vQzR7pgT5z5 yC4hDDYw05izzYa8DdxaubRZuj7Y4j83E+VULTf6paYlP1tQdr82R5bPRbUY4yL+7Ps4 BMYTNgXF80heWfss0dMUetMkagXyAFwqu6cmTUxNYQtDR8g5mdfnXbX/I2CdVbS5d9Fa 2WiP92wj1a6PBSXQWCBcOmeTTN/F6tQZraN+e2QmLaEsScYCczeBeheI5hFzx+wSSsWS MORFdYhzfXcCd3j61qdY2HjDcaBNTyywlF4BuEqnr37pGzrBzOUiWreydvEk4mFB7UXe oIgQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.122.201 with SMTP id lu9mr3438952pab.40.1392916432057; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:13:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-47-153-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.47.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q7sm13001432pbc.20.2014.02.20.09.13.50 for <trans@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530637C7.303@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:13:43 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trans@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/E71GcOOjwW8vVx-tAEAQHVn15K0
Subject: [Trans] Milestones
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:14:00 -0000

One of the first things we need to do is to establish milestones
for working group deliverables, specifically a target date for
getting 6962bis through working group last call.  It's my
sense right now that things are going pretty smoothly and there
are no major points of contention.  If we shoot for November
2014 for wglc we'd be able to discuss problems that come up
during last call at the November meeting.  So:

Does November 2014 seem reasonable for working group last
call for 6962bis?

Melinda