IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Toronto session

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F15B1A0723 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nTfq-DINY2nU for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED71A6F4B for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id lf12so2055969vcb.27 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yzX/nmXM+/YpYHG4oV6aie6JHfsG6G5fROVITcU7HkE=; b=mmB0SzWrED+yyFaIlxOF0rJlRc9Mf9H9qhfVkXoPjQmYjcdvS+BsX6Ray5RDX18C5n VGLYiqZQepXGCptBql4VLlsNxrpx27o8pi/CpBNXQTFd4TWjSKsNHGMWreiOY9o8LQRu TEkrM6UmgKc1AOUaZNjSh9g6Wo6T7pz5GnnPi1ukiFfOkUOeXOudyUwvxRcdUhNrd0Vo Upz7BC/PqyAzbwg5lkcUldM5cRdrYTajdw9vR5JGXeSY3vV2eE1mi58fvK+ewvY9KqGF YOMUfmLh1vTv6OtEAEBPWjOXyCt1CAVg/cws7fMSvs+p60w6ofVCHf1qIgJtLSXqpdv0 2s5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yzX/nmXM+/YpYHG4oV6aie6JHfsG6G5fROVITcU7HkE=; b=iTzePF8qIFuM6HQMfIWwA/J3rlaPJfxOcvGjA7aj8xuKuMaLoaag6jox0I8YCLt/BZ PNJRlOn+SQvOh9ZGYYIGmhqcXIU05BbCo9YZpUvvw2nV3MFeCBw8sArQIJsjr0SErc3K Su6AqOwCZM9LDjVIejJapsdaGTDzdIeyBZGM3Jycfjgkp5BbtBRo5m/v/mAzFpRQV+u9 zgDF7N/d4p9KWeo0rhpcPCXqPzZMAt0iolLwLXLbKIV1stOVIYNuaqSzDcKy+dde8wyd 1yjkC/AflU1juD3ek8Izk2hmIiaAOTEP7aN7MJf4ezr1QRHTiUBPRxPXw29KDlNTz+V4 RAvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnAUCJGMYnt5xayMMwgZQWCTcRWV09CH+GUy0QFtO539RwjGYzCblP8oKAQc+UsNqOQyVTnJZM2kjYRX1oGDwprvNKgCcsqBxT4vvsiAPJ1DNiov98oFrOQDDJBesWVSc8xUA5mcDIBx4H7qP5366sJ6KIEzPLNT1mRAB8IlP0I4khUeK8UTAYbydlyl1B3zU1GgVkb
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.26.10 with SMTP id rk10mr3633975vcb.0.1398858341598; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.100.4 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <535FBD92.7020701@gmail.com>
References: <535FBD92.7020701@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:45:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9SQ=Je72DJcxBETYv89f7yYx+U4vW=_MiFPKTktzho3f5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11339ae48ae67904f84116a3"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/EheV2ZVdQRTMN8k-1wuxLO5iz10
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Toronto session
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:45:46 -0000

On 29 April 2014 15:56, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:

> I need to get a session request in for the Toronto meeting.
> I have a strong preference for using face to face meeting time
> for discussion and for resolving issues that have been raised on
> the mailing list or in the issue tracker.  Right now things
> seem to be going smoothly, but I'd like to get a sense from
> the people actually doing the work of what they feel would benefit
> from face-to-face discussion, how much time they think is
> needed, whether or not there are outstanding issues that need
> more explanation, etc.
>
> Trying to figure out how much time to request, as well.  The
> options are 1 hour, 2 hours, 2.5 hours, and some combination
> in multiple sessions.  Right now my feeling is that we wouldn't
> need more than two hours but I'm open to requesting more
> if there's a need.
>

What's the deadline for this? We have the CT Hack Day coming up next week,
and we might have a better view, at least from our end, on what's left
after that. We intend to do some work on the I-D.

Which reminds me, I put the wrong OIDs into -02, I need to push a new
version.

-- 
Certificate Transparency is hiring! Let me know if you're interested.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email