IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>

Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com> Wed, 02 October 2019 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rob@sectigo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B66E12087F for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=comodoca.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUgtuvxEMZn5 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr710077.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.71.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B84C120867 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=W3TqvpJ2OTakwGMSW5IKbJ2ekBGadUJw+0FHVpQVv1ehyosYCqjFqBeVXmEfb9sF2G2B4Yap9jbJ6jCNpeBNNxdteRHwinIlMCYwlXjoPf7IpDo3kZrpKJHk4jNTey8XrHEfNoAF2GKBebg5uAHil2c3Mv3z/mD/060LJGSwosLDMAO8Rd77GKJOaD6ncjD+VXEBg+41n6v2TSrNDeNPWS5pLXJkuvBjxawtBpeT+++73PXm1TsDYX7rlNvc7WZEvcdxUL7wKy2EFzzbSjjgLse5t88eKxsg6bEGNx99FT1LLaWPtlQz9MxSkmF0pLEwmX77rPhvToEmYDqKOrv5iw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8PXp3+8nm8NF0EJCdKWlPf1K/j+SVMBAQkh+qghy32o=; b=K5I3mLCwKKGcDazYuuFCqLAiFm/0ijTVG7/iiDq62svB3K5b25NGIyWuuWqKsPQfWDQESeqG25kt7cznyU8sXDRT4Lqsc1jDFRjT5Jn0zgtIIFk2G6cUCgxCJlFCMUrjXeQHWGRl2ZvU/K0NxczIU4V+ev9lbjGkGQl9fJxoeub5bM8p0qEr9oqJIaHNSB0vPT7OLIBh+HTHU522zmHUzG8j1da1ff53waRcmaQLXKCKrA7bh/sxMkB/l0BBtoPDq07kfSudTLR5lTyt9toCPeZfnxXowrAuQZgNM1QRC6CDWzT62c/6W6sxprvz60YVyLMQ40xVt4JgwRUTOApS3g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sectigo.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=sectigo.com; dkim=pass header.d=sectigo.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comodoca.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-comodoca-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8PXp3+8nm8NF0EJCdKWlPf1K/j+SVMBAQkh+qghy32o=; b=fvKZWRe2aQaJ6A4zGA0rFg+ZDmaO5nO8nXIVPXh/KYWv8OBb18gdUQJDsetuBLjSJlZQFoc3dO3qdfUiT7kgfG1Ae9K8J8ZjH15idXX0MOF81zupZ+AXGYx6TjH57GovjI5Lq5FyZVEKX+CYOVc2SDJ6IEmBOdXpQ3+6YgV+jdc=
Received: from DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (20.176.124.223) by DM6PR17MB2955.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (20.178.228.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.20; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:49:08 +0000
Received: from DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c8b:aa25:83b0:6c85]) by DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c8b:aa25:83b0:6c85%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.017; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:49:08 +0000
From: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>
To: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
CC: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>, Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
Thread-Topic: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>
Thread-Index: AdVvREj2DdEV5M/hT+uTLxGHks8RfwDfW8cAABCTjgABk2Y2CQ==
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:49:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR17MB3162421FA5F9B3E45C9701D6AA9C0@DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SY2PR01MB276490D6C4040637426A787CE5880@SY2PR01MB2764.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <627fc1e2-b31a-f735-d85b-f16966a744ca@sectigo.com>, <20190924141520.376fbedc7f469fe9971568f7@andrewayer.name>
In-Reply-To: <20190924141520.376fbedc7f469fe9971568f7@andrewayer.name>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rob@sectigo.com;
x-originating-ip: [185.69.144.9]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: dc4522e4-d527-434e-ca28-08d7476934fc
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR17MB2955:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR17MB29553AA2DD4758A7ACAC57D8AA9C0@DM6PR17MB2955.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0178184651
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(396003)(136003)(39850400004)(366004)(376002)(199004)(189003)(8936002)(25786009)(91956017)(105004)(76116006)(236005)(54896002)(8676002)(9686003)(1730700003)(102836004)(81156014)(6506007)(478600001)(6306002)(53546011)(446003)(2906002)(606006)(14444005)(64756008)(2351001)(19627405001)(66946007)(66476007)(66446008)(966005)(66556008)(71190400001)(71200400001)(55016002)(5660300002)(5640700003)(7736002)(76176011)(99286004)(33656002)(54906003)(81166006)(7696005)(6436002)(316002)(486006)(14454004)(6916009)(186003)(86362001)(52536014)(256004)(26005)(6246003)(2501003)(6116002)(229853002)(3846002)(4326008)(66066001)(74316002)(476003)(11346002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR17MB2955; H:DM6PR17MB3162.namprd17.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: sectigo.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: DizKQTI+RufN6XouTccirn9ck9jsGtWpqiRPZVoFO4CAshD5FNewaKhUEH0xjxeWrqXT4rtj66lEfCoKF0dNcO8sogyR8LIkCYNbQCXlcIgbdbTszRtgKxBa3LinGZ4ipp3eBP+1pV3kNKeUvruW58His+Ic6nqWjvfWT/is4p0jKibFNRzBoUfpKjuVtOzj/k/U1kLn/qX/+xYreDOtyI4PLMJD+pWy3mgc34Crk3ot3lE9urNFdO6lBmLK3Ptd9xplz8yCp0XVZxO/2QHw3PJH0BCaPGk3CXvb1n5zjjMByzsvuU6QPQuVreAFeoQNqfNKKBfnTIxmWzfmY8y9UQcDa4E4llFUTU9TNlSSy9+CXymCZndrW0BJ3QvrCwWmg/Tl+KQ0d/0zq+HU5SUgldtNC5CD+5oiE4YMp2oWx658Z5bWl1ctvwd6GNoOHb6gjt7hpvY0ZRHETaIDKDw5LA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR17MB3162421FA5F9B3E45C9701D6AA9C0DM6PR17MB3162namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sectigo.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dc4522e4-d527-434e-ca28-08d7476934fc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Oct 2019 18:49:07.8107 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0e9c4894-6caa-465d-9660-4b6968b49fb7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: lG66LW+Z2IzH1jsikJ1x1LuVpRmrZfvWSQ8mOYnatBYOblQlNtfww3E5Wv251MiqyeYt+MD5OVSDLUiLE4Kdxw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR17MB2955
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/EvvC4MJDGXk4LtHYmkYkNoaGtfM>
Subject: Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:49:12 -0000

Paul, Melinda,

May I go ahead and merge https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313?

James (via a private message) and Andrew have both given it the thumbs up, but it's still not clear to me what the 6962-bis authors can or can't do at this point in the editing cycle.

Thanks.

________________________________
From: Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
Sent: 24 September 2019 19:15
To: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>
Cc: Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>; trans@ietf.org <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs <log server>

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:20:46 +0000
Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com> wrote:

> [Chairs: Given the stage we're at with this document, please could I
> ask you to confirm whether or not we may adopt James's editorial
> suggestions?]
>
> On 20/09/2019 03:17, Manger, James wrote:
> > Editorial suggestions for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis.
>
> James: Thanks!  I think your editorial suggestions add clarity.
>
> Here's a PR:
> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313

This is a good change.  With RFC6962, some implementations include
"https://" when addressing logs and others don't.  This change
makes clear that "https://" should be included.

Regards,
Andrew

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email