Re: [Trans] two week WGLC started for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 03 June 2021 22:21 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895F73A1CB5 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OL68noTqanHn for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57CFA3A1CB7 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fx0j006KBzG9J; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 00:20:52 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1622758852; bh=Nw1fBQBccrGGFW/3QwOpfj+xaaBAqM9KpVjq6b4BHBE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=IcQXHLXz4uZmfh+QAMeQ1XNJYVUO6ddDyXs8A5W5ZY5xAmP+cfSGvO7NrxSEeb/8o zCO0YbGgirmv/BM6GA+o7m8+ebxSbOrrx1kTvn8NjelhG9sCtFTnaDfD60sIfcda/9 iHl39W5s48F1Uux2bRBpdJ7dj+HGAhKQstYht4oU=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3aUfYFdxPhC; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 00:20:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 00:20:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A376E7C503; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 18:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976387C502; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 18:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 18:20:47 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: Trans <trans@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <506783df-9e0-b4b-12b5-bee9748a63a0@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <404e4cf8-bb49-7b50-111a-956602a5db6@nohats.ca>
References: <506783df-9e0-b4b-12b5-bee9748a63a0@nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/GDSZ_iuylfyJB7NyYecLaUvYfpo>
Subject: Re: [Trans] two week WGLC started for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 22:21:04 -0000
On Mon, 17 May 2021, Paul Wouters wrote: > This starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for the bis document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ > > The WGLC ends June 1st. Unfortunately, we did not get any comments. It is understandable, as most people who have been active on this lately are all authors of the document or PR requests. So despite the lack of comments, we will continue the process so the IETF LC can start and we can go and publish this document. Paul & Melinda
- [Trans] two week WGLC started for draft-ietf-tran… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Trans] two week WGLC started for draft-ietf-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Trans] two week WGLC started for draft-ietf-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Trans] two week WGLC started for draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw