Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?

"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@ietf.org> Wed, 10 May 2017 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+trans@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C230129A9F for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XEpSqaFkmpC1; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6191293E4; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 1.0.10
Precedence: bulk
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.10, by Edgewall Software
X-Trac-Project: Public Notary Transparency Wiki
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:53:16 -0000
X-URL:
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/170#comment:4
Message-ID: <037.cf9a26445081cd09e3a5f02e69eccb34@ietf.org>
References: <022.9d8a06990859596aaa23fdb00d6774bc@ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 170
In-Reply-To: <022.9d8a06990859596aaa23fdb00d6774bc@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/GX4yfzWsjiihutUYObRQhlSzbYA>
Subject: Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:53:20 -0000

#170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
-------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  rlb@…        |       Owner:  eranm@…
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  assigned
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  review
Component:  rfc6962-bis  |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by linus@…):

 From
 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/slDhAuH3WW1AvX9wManfViWe4fg:
 "I withdraw my support for separate keys for signing SCT's and STH's and
 will update #170 to reflect this."

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/170#comment:4>
Public Notary Transparency  Wiki <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans>
My example project