Re: [Trans] Tracking implementations

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> wrote:
> On 30 July 2014 17:13, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> During the session last week I was a bit surprised by the number of
>> people saying that they were doing implementations, and I think it
>> might be useful to get a better handle on that.  If nothing else, it
>> helps quite a bit during the publication process if it's known
>> that there are interoperable implementations and that we know a little
>> bit about them.
>>
>> So, I'd be grateful if people who've are working on implementations
>> and who can discuss them publicly could speak up, let us know the
>> status and whether or not you'll be releasing source, and provide a
>> pointer to a repo or other documentation if you're able.  Also let
>> me know whether or not you'd be willing to have your implementation
>> mentioned on a wiki page listing implementations.
>
> Obviously(?) Google has an open source implementation here:
> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency.

My understanding is that this is only an implementation of a CT log,
am I correct ?

> We also have two internal production implementations, both of which
> share as much code as is feasible with the open source. No current
> plan to release source that is not already released.
>
> Feel free to mention them on a wiki page.
>
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> Melinda
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trans mailing list
>> Trans@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> Trans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans