IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] DNSSEC also needs CT

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sun, 11 May 2014 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095721A0338 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 08:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxGD9PplMQoB for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208801A0261 for <trans@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 May 2014 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390E281703; Sun, 11 May 2014 11:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1399822680; bh=nxJ6Gs9zyqGS8OsQ8AiUYFST5ICKzF0R2WcgiBcJ5YQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=RGGko/VKYhftK4SJvrcaBPswLUHVulTp4CVal6VJwR781erbg4Pio+igJN/AsXyBi bWD/Gk1bFWg+qVHZMjsDQYrTy1IRhZE0QsGmkJtaaDXvqe2gKz8LQoV+dSQEwnNqaG AGvXnUTJySynSGsmyevlAPk7q+oHUse+XurE+/Zk=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s4BFbxnb032714; Sun, 11 May 2014 11:37:59 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:37:59 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjKDvi22SHLRDuEq=v4BXsD1_EyvCeuUxZBk7YDcLpr8w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1405111136110.31230@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAK3OfOjiL2DTJPH3CaAjg8YGrrwN56SgQ+DnqPXx4MLbgXQN+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwieij8Tm8V-gpE0eAfwie1dgtFL_Ga8dPkJFKJKLQDAcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiKjY6YyiyeHiFJrecZfj_uQ-2k+KucKnzb9Yt8VCRPOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKpN7AXfrH6SzroMukrKTPR5z24U9KfWpVW-F2R_wX3ag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1405101722240.897@bofh.nohats.ca> <536F8BC4.5070405@fifthhorseman.net> <CAMm+LwjKDvi22SHLRDuEq=v4BXsD1_EyvCeuUxZBk7YDcLpr8w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/Hr80lu-aBr2dk6Z9PXlnRAsQFrw
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] DNSSEC also needs CT
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 15:38:08 -0000

On Sun, 11 May 2014, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> It is probably fair to assume that CT logs will be maintained by CAs

That would be a non-starter for those people (let's call them the defcon
crowd) who are looking at dnssec as a way out of the trust in a handful
of CAs or TLD operators.

> The main question is what purpose a CT log for DNSSEC would serve. For
> me the value would be to protect my domain against having it stolen by
> ICANN.

Or any of the parental zones above your own zone.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email