Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962
Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Tue, 11 March 2014 12:34 UTC
Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC501A0715 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2m4ElS9Rtjks for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (eth5.brad-fw.brad.office.ccanet.co.uk [178.255.87.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E316B1A070E for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29911 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Mar 2014 12:34:35 -0000
Received: from nigel.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:34:35 +0000
Message-ID: <531F02DB.6030701@comodo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:34:35 +0000
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
References: <CAMm+LwhpCD9gf_XJUTsKBo3739jOeiHdedqWwi3b0jkeZkSo8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhpCD9gf_XJUTsKBo3739jOeiHdedqWwi3b0jkeZkSo8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/KXNa5wxbfA5lkGasnNFEtXpv_UI
Subject: Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:34:43 -0000
On 10/03/14 20:58, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > Following on from my last one that went out early... <snip> > 3) Shouldn't it be possible for a service to manage multiple logs? I > would think this particularly important in the case of a retrieve-only > log which is serving multiple logs. But the same point can be made about > the add operation. https://<log server>/ct/v1/add-chain Phill, are you assuming that "<log server>" can't have a "/" in it? If so, that's an invalid assumption. The values of "<log server>" for the 2 CT Logs that Google are currently operating are "ct.googleapis.com/pilot" and "ct.googleapis.com/aviator". -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online
- [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Further comments on RFC 6962 Eran Messeri